Democrats and the media have perfected the art of synchronized jumping to conclusions in choreographed precision such that it is hard to distinguish the two groups. For simplicity, let’s just call them media-crats.  In a court of law, jumping to a conclusion would be a jury rendering a verdict before the trial even began. Or conversely jumping away from a conclusion would mean exoneration despite the crime being caught on video from 17 different angles along with a notarized confession. As Rush Limbaugh likes to say, “It’s not the nature of the evidence but the seriousness of the charge” determining media-crat reaction. Or in other words, will the logical conclusion help or hurt media-crat causes? If their narrative advances one of their core issues, conclusions are swift and definitive. Conversely, if harmful to their agenda, we cannot rush to judgement and anyone who does so is immediately shut down. Recent events illustrate the jumping...(Read Full Article)