Why are ‘conservative’ influencers promoting welfare spending?

If you like American Thinker’s content, please consider subscribing here for access to an exclusive, weekly newsletter offering insight from the editorial staff.

The mockingbird media isn’t just a leftwing spectacle anymore, as more and more “conservative” influencers join the ranks of what is derogatorily known as Conservative, Inc. (or ConInc.), parroting the “conservative” establishment narrative.

We saw it with “Phase 1” of the Epstein files when a slew of selected “influencers” paraded around with white binders on the White House containing absolutely no new information before posting almost identical messages to social media about how Pam Bondi wasn’t really to blame for the colossal fumble, and now, ConInc. is shilling for welfare and food stamps.

Dr. Simon Goddek collected a few screenshots from Eric Daugherty, Ian Michael Cheong, and Jenna Ellis:

And here’s another:

Talk about a paid script.

Now, according to ClownWorld, this “campaign” was not on behalf of Big Soda, but was “strictly a campaign against government overreach.” I have to wonder though, what kind of leading “conservative” can’t discern on their own that curtailing ostentatious purchases while using someone else’s money to buy your groceries—a 12-pack of Pepsi now costs somewhere between seven and ten dollars—has nothing to do with government overreach? Sure, if the government were banning Pepsi from manufacturing or selling its product… but it’s not. Removing eligible items from food stamps to cover only the bare essentials is a good first start—but it’s a program that should be entirely abolished. At least, that’s the real conservative position. I’ve said this before but apparently I have to say it again for “conservative” influencers who just post what they’re told to post without thinking (best case scenario)—there should be no government welfare. It’s theft, disguised as charity, but the role of charity in a society belongs to the church, or anyone personally compelled to act charitably.

I don’t buy coke for my household for a number of reasons: We avoid high fructose corn syrup, I don’t need the empty calories, and it’s too expensive and I have to budget my money. From someone who pays for her own grocery bill, I can’t afford to blow ten bucks on pure garbage. (We’re a water and raw milk household all the way).

Idiots, they’re all idiots. Or, liars.

Ian Smith, remembered for his defiant stance against New Jersey’s governor Phil Murphy during the tyranny of COVID lockdowns when he kicked in the boarded up entry to his own gym, explains it like this:

Shills, shills, and more shills.

Free image, Pixabay license.

Image: Free image, Pixabay license.

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues