Signal debacle – maybe intentional
There has already been much (far too much) ink spilt over the Signal app debacle surrounding the White House leadership call regarding the Houthi strike.
The Democrats, without an affirmative message, have found yet something else to light their hair on fire over.
Andrea Widburg posted a great piece yesterday - Trump officials ‘inadvertently’ include a reporter in their Yemen chat.
While the jury is still out on how “a reporter” got on the call, for me the line in Casablanca comes to mind;
“Of all the gin joints in all the world, she walks into mine.”
Of all the reporters in the all the world, how is it that Trump-hating, slime merchant Jeffery Goldberg was sent a secured invitation to join a call like that?
Coincidence? Happenstance? Carelessness? Or, treason?
The Democrat party’s agenda for the foreseeable future is resistance.
Blocking DOGE employees from buildings. Locking doors, computers and elevators.

Filing lawsuits against any and every Executive Order issued by the president.
Posting messages on the Medicare payment system suggesting that payments were going to be postponed or cancelled.
Removing historical information highlighting the Tuskagee Airmen and the Navajo code talkers.
Lighting Tesla cars and Tesla dealerships on fire.
I don’t believe in coincidences or happenstance.
It is my opinion that someone on Michael Waltz’s staff added Goldberg to the call, to create a problem for the president and his cabinet.
Breitbart has reported that President Trump has confirmed that an “NSC Staffer” added Goldberg to the call, but did not elaborate on how or why.
I’ll elaborate – hook this person up to a lie-detector machine immediately.
Ask him how and why Goldberg’s number was added to the call. If added nefariously, arrest this person and immediately try him or her for treason.
Further, if this turns out to be the case he was a federal career employee and not a political appointee, immediately re-continue firing and early retirement of federal employees, citing national security concerns as justification. We cannot have people burrowed throughout our government, working against the president’s (and our) interest.
Image: Pixabay, via Picryl // CCO 1.0 Universal Public Domain
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.