The second assassination attempt was not 'apparent'
Everywhere I look for news updates on the Trump assassination attempt I’m confronted by the word “apparent.” Headlines all over legacy media (my browser’s cache was chockful of them) disseminate variations of “Trump’s apparent assassination attempt…” Up until at least 0930 PST, the day after.
My goodness, the would-be assassin is a Dem donkey’s ass-assin, without the wit to repugn the verbal violence from Dem asses against President Trump. That’s apparent, but his acting out is manifest.
The ass-assin wasn’t out there shooting birdies with his AK-47 from the out-of-bounds rough on the golf course. There was nothing “apparent” about it -- his intentions (corroborated by his social media profile) were bleedin’ obvious.
Admittedly, we don’t want journalists condemning someone as guilty before their due process in a court of law. That’s why they engage in verbal gymnastics to insist a perpetrator is “alleged” to have committed a crime, even if caught on video committing it. Ultimately, for our own sake, even the lowest lowlifes roaming amongst us receive “innocent until proven” protections. Perhaps that makes their eventual conviction even more compelling and convincing.
But the “alleged” word usage is distinct from today’s MSM applications of “apparent.” While the suspect needs to be proven guilty in accord with centuries of Western jurisprudence (for our sake more than his), that doesn’t mean the underlying crime was “apparent.”
Nope, the evidence is evident. Imagine if the lunatic had some political figure other than Trump in his sights -- the MSM would be going apoplectic. All else being equal, including all the evidence, they’d describe the assassination attempt as a horrific attack on “democracy.” It wouldn’t be “apparent,” but irrefutable. Jeffries and Schumer would already be introducing gun-ban bills. Nancy would put up more fences… somewhere. There’d be hearings, inquisitions, and political posturing.
Here’s what’s apparent: pure providence (manifested in the personages of an alert Secret Service agent and bystander) protected Trump, and helped catch his “alleged” ass-ailant. Given the overwhelming empirical evidence, the truth seems to be dying once again in the dank crypts of the MSM. The “alleged” journalists are ass-aulting our democracy -- that’s what is apparent.
Image: AT via Magic Studio

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction