Economic illiteracy strikes again at the WSJ
It is a true shame that the WSJ contributes so much to the economic illiteracy plaguing the media and the American people.
This article, by Sam Goldfarb at The Wall Street Journal, talks about stock market investors and their “hope” that 2024 is a “return to long-lost normalcy.” Yet Goldfarb says investors can’t hope for a repeat of the 24% gain in 2023, which essentially “erased” the 2022 losses—but this is completely misleading. If you lose 24% in one year, you have to make a much higher return in the following year to make up for that loss.
For example: In 2022, the average investor started with $144,280 and at the end of the year they were down to $111,210—they lost 23%, or $33,070. To get back the $33,070 with the starting balance of $111,210 you would need to earn almost 30%, not just the 23%.
An easier example would be if you started with a $100,000 balance and lost 50%, you would be down to $50,000; to get back to the $100,000, you would have to earn 100%.
It is a shame that the WSJ, the government, and brokers act like they restore lost dollars when they categorically do not.
It is no wonder the country is so broke when there is so much economic illiteracy out there, including within the community of supposed-experts.
It is the same reason we get politicians like Biden claiming prices are dropping, when all that is decreasing is the rate of price increase; prices are still rising.
Another misleading piece of information we see is that if wages are rising 4%, and inflation is rising 3.5%, then they say that wages are rising faster than inflation. The problem is that those are gross wages, and people don’t take home gross wages; they take home net wages, which is typically 70% of gross wages. Therefore, a 4% raise only yields 2.8% in increased purchasing power. That is why people can’t cover their bills, and why they are not enamored by Bidenomics.
Basically, it is very easy to manipulate statistics, and once agian, the WSJ reaffirmed its status as a repeat offender.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8f8/9d8f844c0e34d215b7cc3ea3aed71a1523578a42" alt=""
Image generated by AI.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Greg Gutfeld Save New York City?
- President Trump at CPAC
- Unmasking Comedian Zelensky's Deception and His True Role in the War on the Global Stage
- Montana Cowboys, Adam Smith, and Trump
- If Trump Wants Canada, Here’s How He Gets It
- The Democrats' Failed Anti-DOGE Narratives
- Meet the Cartels
- President Trump of the 30 (and a Couple) Days
- Rep. Jason Smith Calls for Revocation of Jewish Voice for Peace's Tax Exemption
- Let’s Make ‘Temporary Protected Status’ Really Temporary
Blog Posts
- The Zeitgeist passes Germany by with these election results
- California's voters get a whiff of Kamala's brain on fire
- Media disseminates fear porn over Trump’s federal downsizing
- DOJ Weaponization Working Group: Another form of weaponization?
- Birthright citizenship and Democrat hypocrisy
- The upside-down election of Trump
- Vatican's unsettling press releases suggesting all's well with the ailing pope evoke the Kremlin
- All of a sudden, the media and other Democrats are worried about job losses
- Dan Bongino’s life, fortune, and sacred honor
- The dance of the vanities
- No more ‘climate change’ Popes
- Donald Trump takes down Maine's Governor
- Did DEI contribute to the Delta/Endeavor crash?
- The People's Republic of Colorado wants to ban them all
- Media fails; NBC settles