Australian nightclub bans staring without prior consent
Club 77, a nightclub in Sydney, Australia, has banned staring at another patron without consent. Its managers will call the police if a customer stares at others without getting their consent. The establishment also asked clubbers not to darken its doors if the "sole purpose" for their night out is to meet someone to "pick up."
What a fun venue!
In an Instagram post, the club said "safety officers" — in pink vests — would enforce the new anti-staring rules. It also noted it wanted to be a "safe space."
Via the U.K. Sun.
"Safety officers"...in "pink vests"? Is Club 77 a gay bar? Sounds like a Freddie Mercury fantasy. Does it continually play songs by Queen and The Village People over its sound system? What happens if one stares at the "safety officers"?
"Oh, mister safety officer, I've been bad and need to be punished!"
But seriously, what a load! Who decides what constitutes staring? In what direction, how intensely, for how long? And what if someone is wearing a mask? No one could tell if that person was smiling, leering, sneering, or anything else. And what if that person were blind?
Will bars and nightclubs in the formerly Wild West soon throw patrons out if they call someone "baby," "sweetie," or "hon"? Will the proper authorities be called if one patron winks at another without prior, express written consent? What if they accidentally graze another in a crowded bar? Will a partially stifled belch attract the attention of management?
It is exceedingly hard to believe what has happened to Western nations in recent years due to otherwise decent people's extreme and unwarranted tolerance of the authoritarian — and spectacularly intolerant — left. Australia began as a penal colony, for crying out loud.
And so it is again. But one whose wardens sport pink vests — and whose inmates have glanced in someone's direction without prior approval.

Ergo, intimate nightclub conversations will now go something like this: "Would you please sign this document stating unequivocally that I have the right to gaze approvingly in your direction, at least for tonight at this particular venue?"
And they say romance is dead!
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
- Deep-State Sabotage in the DoD?
- What DOGE Is Accomplishing
- From Churchill to Vance...Sounding Off About Tyranny
- Globalist Games: They Play, We Pay
- Scorched-Earth Disease Control
- NATO, Ukraine, and the War Hawks’ Pixie Dust Playbook
Blog Posts
- The Obamas' podcast bombs
- Did Stacey Abrams’s NGO really get $2 billion for appliances to hand out to Americans?
- Mark Kelly exposes the hypocrisy behind the Democrats’ electric vehicle fixation
- Washington state attorney general is mad at sheriff's office for complying with federal law
- Can Trump and the team really win?
- The Democrat party is in dire need of shock therapy in the form of hard truths
- CNN wants you to know that Biden did not strand the astronauts Musk is rescuing
- Could Rahm Emanuel be the Democrats' great hope for 2028?
- The South African ambassador’s fate shows that America will no longer be bullied
- Nvidia: The Vera and Fritz chips
- A track attack
- Dem violence and manhood
- Ending the Fed
- Hey Chuck, you need a tune-up
- Kari Lake is kickin' it at USAGM and its Voice of America subsidiary