What Dobbs actually says
Many smart people are misinformed on what the majority opinion in the Dobbs case held. The Supreme Court did not criminalize abortion. It said nothing about whether the procedure should be legal or not. It merely said that the Court as an institution never should have involved itself in the issue. As such, it returned the issue to the political arena, where it belongs, for the people, through their elected representatives in the statehouses (and perhaps Congress) to decide.
Second, contrary to some commentators on the left, the Supreme Court did not "go rogue." For years, many liberal commentators, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself prior to joining the court, agreed that Roe was bad law. Alito's well crafted decision made that clear.
Third, here's a fun fact. For the first two years of Obama's first term, Democrats had a supermajority — filibuster-proof control over Congress. Yet, despite the known threat to Roe at that time, they did not even attempt to pass a law granting a nationwide right to abortion. I suspect that this is because Democrats would rather have the threat to abortion access a live issue to use for fundraising purposes and to rile up their base.
Fourth, liberals have ceased to lionize Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She was old during Obama's term and had several well publicized health scares. Perhaps her decision to not resign and allow Barack Obama the opportunity to replace her with another liberal justice should be viewed as selfish. Instead, following her death, and days before the 2020 election, President Trump replaced her with Amy Coney Barrett, who was part of the Dobbs majority.
We may have witnessed the most consequential two days in Supreme Court history. In addition to striking down Roe and Casey, the Court also greatly expanded gun rights and limited the ability to enforce Miranda rights. No matter what one may think about Donald Trump, his presidency is proving to be perhaps the most highly consequential of any president who served a single four-year term.
Josh Kantrow is a cyber-security attorney based in Chicago.
Image: Max Pixel.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border