The Supreme Court worm has finally turned
In Dobbs, the constitutional worm has turned to face its attackers. Dobbs is not about abortion; it is about the Constitution. Dobbs is not about religion; it is about the Constitution. Dobbs is not about morality; it is about the Constitution.
Of the three branches of our government, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, the first two are called the "political branches" because their subject matter is politics and policy. The subject matter of the Judicial branch, however, is law and logic, not politics and policy. The proper philosophy of the Judicial Branch is "Fiat Judicia; ruat Coelem," which translates "to let justice be done though the heavens fall."
To be constitutionally valid, a decision must logically flow from the text of the Constitution itself plus those valid decisions of the constitutional jurisprudence the Supreme Court has developed over time. Dobbs overrules Roe precisely because Roe fails this test, which is a failure that has been repeatedly observed by so many commentators over so many years. What is different today is the sudden appearance of a majority on the Court willing to do its judicial duty and follow the law.
Will Roe be the last evil holding to fall? Probably not, although it may be some time before others fall, too.
Image: United States Supreme Court (edited). Public domain.
The law has been traditionally presented in two broad categories, known as "substantive law" and "procedural law." The terminology is pretty self-explanatory. Substantive law deals with rights and duties, whereas procedural law deals with the procedures whereby these rights and duties are claimed, asserted, and implemented.
In their zeal to create constitutional rights unknown to the Constitution, the progressives have created a new category called "substantive due process," an obvious oxymoron. Justice Clarence Thomas already has his sights on decisions based on substantive due process, stating "Because any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous,' we have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents."
At long last, the constitutional worm has turned! There is definitely more to come! This may well herald a whole new era for the American Republic!

Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump-O-Phobia Drives Some Americans to Questionable Greener Pastures Overseas
- A Businessman and a Brilliant Strategist
- A Remarkable Headline for a Fascinating Story
- Democrats Unmask Themselves
- How Mexico Became China’s Trojan Horse in U.S. Trade
- Covid Redux: The Bird Flu Scare
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
Blog Posts
- Hills to Die On: Democrats know how to pick 'em
- Near-death experiences, reliance on oil, and more cataclysmic failures—it’s all just part and parcel of ‘green’ energy
- So where'd America's obesity epidemic come from? Chef Andrew Gruel has a theory ...
- Trump just fired a huge warning shot over Iran’s bow
- Markets respond: Trumpian peace in Russo-Ukrainian war is in the bag
- The time of the hoax
- New York Times goes bipolar on Trump’s border control success
- Mark Kelly decides to offload his Tesla to protest Elon Musk
- The half-million dollar American
- Three things for the U.S. to understand about the Middle East
- Speaker Mike Johnson reveals why the Autopen scandal is a big deal
- The CDC website really needs to update its COVID protocols
- Hands in your back pocket
- Birthright citizenship: The facts
- ‘She’s my little Musk coupe’