The ESG recession
Europe is in the midst of an energy crisis. The U.S. and the rest of the world are paying greatly increased prices for gasoline and other forms of energy. Two billion people rely on wood or dung for heating and cooking. Cheap, reliable energy is becoming a thing of the past. And this is leading to a worldwide recession.
Why are there such problems in the energy sector? The ESG movement and related anti–fossil fuel movements have promised to run the fossil fuel industry out of business and discouraged investment in growing the fossil fuel industry. The ESG movement sees no benefits coming from the use of fossil fuels and sees no downside to closing down the industry and seeking to replace it with wind and solar energy.
However, wind and solar energy have proven to be unreliable and to drive up the cost of electricity. This is because the electricity producing companies in the developed world must also build 100% back up for wind and solar (for when the wind isn't blowing, and the sun isn't shining) to ensure reliable energy. Having 100% back up means increased costs.
The installed economic infrastructure relies heavily on fossil fuels to operate. Undependable expensive energy drives up costs in all industries, but especially in agriculture and distribution/logistics. This is showing up in the tragedy in Sri Lanka. All of this is driving up food costs.
The E.U., led by the Germans, has striven hard over the last couple of decades to build up their wind and solar energy industries, which caused E.U. nations to depend on Russian oil and gas to drive their backup capacity. President Trump warned the Germans about their reliance on Russian natural gas and they laughed at him. Today, the Germans are in an energy crisis and are moving to start burning coal again to provide electricity and power this winter.
The ESG movement in Europe and the U.S. has worked to end the fossil fuel industries. The result has been reduced investment in these industries and reduced infrastructure. The supporters of the ESG movement believed there would be no downside to punishing these industries.
Today, we are seeing some of the downside of eliminating fossil fuels. Energy poverty. Likely shortages of food. Higher prices of both. We will see declining economic activity as people must focus more obtaining food and electricity. Declining economic activity and inflation means recession and stagflation.
This is the ESG recession. If the world continues to punish the fossil fuel industries, it will make things worse.

Photo credit: Rawpixel, public domain.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border