Understanding the military realities regarding Ukraine
When it comes to a surprise attack against another country, there are two schools of thought. First, you can attack with 100% of your military strength to subdue the country instantly. Call it the "ripping off the Band-Aid" or the "shock and awe" approach to conquest. Second, you can go in with some delicacy to see how much pushback you're going to get from the country before you commit your best troops, especially if you'd like to keep civilian casualties to a minimum. This second tactic, Colonel Douglas MacGregor told Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night, is what Putin opted to do:
Note, too, that MacGregor does not believe that Putin wants to swallow Ukraine whole. Instead, Putin has definite objectives in the eastern half of the country and has been planning his angle of attack for a long time.
Incidentally, I'm not saying MacGregor's take is the correct one. I've heard from other people with good strategic and tactical sense that it's crazy (as noted above) to creep into a country and probe its defenses. In this day and age, you'd better know the defenses going in and be prepared to overwhelm them.
Another person sent around an email noting that, while Putin supplies Europe and America with fuel (and will soon do so for China), within Russia itself, there are fuel shortages. Whether that's true or not, it certainly seems to be the case that the Russian convoy is suffering from food and fuel shortages. Given what happened to both Napoleon's and Hitler's troops in Russia, one would think Putin would have paid attention to the dictum often attributed to Napoleon that "an army marches on its stomach" (and, nowadays, on its fuel tanks) and would have made sure that his troops were properly equipped.
To add another dimension to the debate about what Putin was thinking when he crafted his military strategy, it's clear that the Russians are now upping their game and fighting more aggressively against Ukraine's population centers.
Frankly, from a military point of view, Colonel MacGregor's take on matters made sense to me, but I'd be lying to you if I said I had any special insights on the subject that make me worth listening to.
Image: Colonel Douglas MacGregor. YouTube screen grab.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
- I Am Woman
- Slaying the University Dragons
- Canada Embraces European Suicide
- A Multi-Point Attack on the National Debt
- Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
- Now’s the Time to Buy a Nuke (Nuclear Power Plant, That Is)
Blog Posts
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'
- Pro-abortionists amplify an aborton protest's impact
- A broken system waiting to crash
- The U.S. Navy on the border