Trump was right about energy
On energy, President Trump again demonstrated his uncanny ability to see around the corner, and what he saw is now being seen by some Wall Street heavyweights. As a commonsense American, Trump saw the handwriting — now some hand-wringing — that the green energy solutions aren't ready for prime time. While his insights and warnings went unheeded, his message is now getting a hearing on Wall Street.
According to Larry Fink of BlackRock in his 2022 shareholder letter (bold type his):
The transition to net zero is already uneven with different parts of the global economy moving at different speeds. It will not happen overnight. We need to pass through shades of brown to shades of green. For example, to ensure continuity of affordable energy supplies during the transition, traditional fossil fuels like natural gas will play an important role both for power generation and heating in certain regions, as well as for the production of hydrogen.
As we pursue these ambitious goals — which will take time — governments and companies must ensure that people continue to have access to reliable and affordable energy sources. This is the only way we will create a green economy that is fair and just and avoid societal discord. And any plan that focuses solely on limiting supply and fails to address demand for hydrocarbons will drive up energy prices for those who can least afford it, resulting in greater polarization around climate change and eroding progress.
Divesting from entire sectors — or simply passing carbon-intensive assets from public markets to private markets — will not get the world to net zero.
Interestingly, Mr. Fink makes the new "energy equity" argument — namely, that high energy costs are far from equitable and are arguably racist since they target the less fortunate, who all too often are non-white people — not to mention traditionally Democrat voters.
Fink finds himself singing the same tune as hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio. Earlier this year, he addressed a conference in Abu Dhabi.
"Thank God for the oil producers" because they are providing reliable supply, Dalio said Monday on a panel at the Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week summit. Dalio is adding his voice to a chorus urging vigilance in how the world transitions toward greening the economy and the impact it could have on everything from the cost of fuel to food.
As always, politicians are the last to know. But the new "tap the brakes on green energy" message is coming from the folks who bankroll the politicians. So perhaps there's hope for a more Trumpian energy future.

Image: Gage Skidmore.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction