The logic of racism
These days, just about the most damaging charge that can be leveled against one's character is being a racist. True or not, justified or not, the charge by itself is often sufficient to harm a person's reputation, lead to ostracism, and even cause loss of employment. Profuse apologies (and groveling) may work in the short term, but in the long term, one is never quite certain that the stain has been washed away.
A professional philosopher can shed light on the issue, following in the footsteps of the patron saint of moral philosophy, Socrates. I have in mind a recent book by analytic philosopher Thomas L. Carson, who used to teach at Loyola University Chicago. Tom and I went to graduate school together at Brown University. The book is Lincoln's Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2015), which presents definitions of racist beliefs in a chapter titled "Was Lincoln a Racist?" Here are some examples:
- That members of a group with certain racial characteristics are morally or intellectually "inferior."
- That it is permissible to discriminate against members of a group with certain racial characteristics.
- That it is permissible to exploit members of a group with certain racial characteristics.
- That it is permissible to hate or harbor ill will toward members of a group with certain racial characteristics.
- That indifference to the welfare of members of a group with certain racial characteristic is permissible.
It follows that arguing willy-nilly from persons taken singly to groups thereof (institutions, nations, cultures) commits an elementary logical fallacy, composition. Critical Race Theory commits this fallacy. Similarly fallacious is talk of "systemic racism." Another fallacy is that only members of a specific group can be the target of racist beliefs — e.g., blacks — and that only members of specific groups can hold such beliefs — e.g., whites.
So, next time accusations of racism are thrown around in your presence, rehearse the points made here. This may shut up the mudslinger, at least temporarily. But it's unlikely to slow down race-hustlers and the left generally because they're after power at any cost and could not care less about logic and fine distinctions. They'll quote Marx: "Philosophers only interpret the world; the point is to change it." Socrates is turning over in his grave.
Image: Pixabay.
To comment, you can find the MeWe post for this article here.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Not in Kansas Any More
- Democrats Dying on the Most Desolate Hills
- If She’s an Astronaut … I’m a Jet Fighter Pilot
- Is the Jihadist Trojan Horse Winning?
- Who Has the Best American Autobiography?
- This Easter, Let Us Renew Our Faith
- Is it Time to Ignore the Judiciary?
- Higher Ed is Fighting Back!
- Easter: the Resurrection of Jesus Transformed the World Forever
- Trump’s vision for technological greatness
Blog Posts
- Hillary ‘the Russia Hoaxer’ Clinton wants to imprison people for ‘propaganda’
- Rep. Jamie Raskin threatens foreign leaders who cooperate with President Trump with repercussions, 'when we come back to power — and we will'
- Maybe we need more living versions of “Hillbilly Funerals”
- A female fencer's courage is partly rewarded
- Democrats' Cloward-Piven default
- A New Mexico judge resigned over allegations that he kept a Tren de Aragua member in his home
- The Pope’s death is leading to yet more anti-Israel and anti-Trump propaganda
- Ivy League college invites antisemitic rapper onto campus
- Pope Francis, RIP
- It’s not really about Abrego Garcia
- When Oregon became Bart Jason
- Post-election lawfare; legislating from the bench
- Oregon pushes trans track
- The Starliner: worse than we thought
- Professional sports leagues push gun control