Spot the Democrat capitalist pig: Elizabeth Warren
This is my favorite season — not Christmas, but the quadrennial Democrat circular firing squad season, as the race for the presidential nomination starts to get nasty. In the party of the plutocrats, it's not at all uncommon to find that those denouncing billionaires the hardest have enriched themselves by serving the biggest financial interests in the country.
Perhaps the most strident (as well as dishonest) critics of people who earn wealth is Elizabeth Warren, who has disclosed a net worth of $12 million. Yesterday, after taking criticism for months, she released a list of descriptions of her legal work while a professor, and the compensation she received, a total of $2 million (for part-time work while engaged in full-time teaching).
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore.
But as Joshua Jamerson of the Wall Street Journal notes, Warren is refusing to release her tax records for the years in question (sound like a familiar Dem complaint?):
Ms. Warren's rationale for releasing her compensation rather than more tax returns is that her legal work dates back to the mid-1980s and would require about four decades of returns, according to an aide, who said such disclosure would exceed accepted practice. Generally, the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates have released returns to correspond with their time in public life; Ms. Warren was first elected to the Senate in 2012.
The aide also said that tax returns from this period, if released publicly, wouldn't shed light on the legal work because her returns don't itemize the sources or nature of her business income.
As the saying goes, the best defense is a good offense, so...
She and Mr. Buttigieg have been attacking each other in recent days over transparency. Ms. Warren's questions about Mr. Buttigieg's work at consulting powerhouse McKinsey & Co. from 2007 to 2010 prompted him on Friday to release a summary of his projects there.
He stopped short of providing the full client list Ms. Warren has demanded, citing a nondisclosure agreement that he signed while at the company and that has drawn criticism from some liberals critical of big corporations and elite consultants.
There are few spectacles more satisfying than watching Democrats expose each other's hypocrisy.

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.