Bernie Sanders comes out for unconstitutional ex post facto law
No doubt Rep. Ocasio-Cortez approves, but she has the excuse of youth and ignorance. But Senator Bernie Sanders has been in Washington, D.C. long enough to know better, and maybe actually read the Constitution he swore an oath to protect.
So there is no excuse at all for this horrifying tweet:
Here’s a prediction: we are going to win, pass a Green New Deal, and criminally prosecute the fossil fuel executives who destroyed the planet. https://t.co/FjKCHcUHuk
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) December 19, 2019
Under what existing criminal law could executives be prosecuted?
Answer: none. There are no laws against selling legal products.
So in order to criminally prosecute executives, new laws would have to be passed. But the behavior Sanders promises to prosecute already has happened. But clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from passing ex post facto laws:
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
...and clause 1 of Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution prohibits states from doing so.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
These liberties are what former constitutional law lecturer Barack Obama called "negative rights." Negative if you are an aspiring tyrant, that is.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Multi-Point Attack on the National Debt
- Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
- Now’s the Time to Buy a Nuke (Nuclear Power Plant, That Is)
- The Fall and Fall of the Associated Press
- Bill Gates and the AI Delusion
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
Blog Posts
- The UFO mystery
- NYT: Dems in ‘denial’ about ‘comprehensive defeat’
- Stupiditywatch: Columbia's pro-Hamas protestors tear up their own diplomas for the cameras
- U.K. to institute two-tier system of justice?
- We remember those who served in Vietnam
- A curiosity about the DC District Court’s judges
- The 9th Circuit prepares to be reversed again
- Tim Walz really is a knucklehead
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court