Commercial broadcast television heading for a crisis
An entire democratic, economically advanced country may lose advertiser-supported commercial broadcasting, leaving a government-controlled broadcaster with an on-air television monopoly. This would not be due to the state shutting down its private rival, but simply due to the same market forces that are squeezing commercial television with the spread of internet-based media.
Australia's news.com.au reports:
Is New Zealand about to lose its only commercial broadcaster to rival public outlet TVNZ?
The country's sole major network, TV3, is up for sale by owners Mediaworks, and likely buyers are hard to identify.
Australian networks — Seven, Nine and Ten — will be courted, but aren't likely to jump in.
And so it is that around 500 employees at one of New Zealand's biggest media companies are waiting to learn whether they'll have jobs beyond Christmas.
"It is possible they'll close down? Well I think it is possible," Peter Thompson, New Zealand media expert at the Victoria University of Wellington, told AAP.
TV3 logo (YouTube screen grab).
TV3 has to share a market of only 4.74 million people with government-owned TVNZ, which competes with it for advertisers. But the proliferation of streaming services like Netflix along with cable options means that viewership is declining (as it is for U.S. commercial television stations and networks). Evidently, the advertising revenues are insufficient to sustain a workforce of 500, an understandable level of staff for a company that has to cover an entire country almost a thousand miles long with several sizable cities.
Thompson said Mediaworks' television arm turns over around $130 million annually, losing around $10–15 million.
![]()
Nobody is predicting the imminent demise of CBS, NBC, and ABC, but they clearly are facing the same technological and economic forces that may close New Zealand's TV3.
There is something alarming about the prospect of a government monopoly on broadcast television. Unless people are willing to pay a subscription fee, they will be reliant on their governments for the high-impact news that television provides.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett mocks Texas's wheelchair-bound governor Abbott as 'Gov. Hot Wheels,' then keeps digging