The victims of the low bail movement that progressives have created
By pretending to champion as victims people who are accused of serious crimes, progressives are re-victimizing some of their favorite objects of concern.
The Left thinks too many people are in jail and prison. The crime drop that has accompanied what they derisively call "mass incarceration" means nothing to them. Now openly the party of felons — with states like Virginia allowing felons to vote and Bernie Sanders calling for even the vilest imprisoned people to participate in the selection of our political elders, criminals are now an important constituency for the Dems.
Incarcerating people who are awaiting trial is obviously potentially unjust, given that some of them will be found not guilty. The sole legitimate reason to keep people who have not been convicted behind bars is the fear of flight from the jurisdiction where justice awaits. And that's why the system of bail (and bail bondsmen) exists.
Posting a sum of money (or a lien on some valuable property) that would be forfeited is supposed to guarantee that the accused will appear in court.
Enter the "bail reform" movement, which seeks to make posting bond economical — even easy. No state has gone farther than Illinois, where a 2017 Bail Reform Act has proved so problematic that a repeal movement is underway.
The Chicago Tribune (non-paywall version here) points out that the real victims of low and no-bail release of the accused are the very people the Left progs pretend to champion:
Cook County judges have sharply lowered bonds for people accused of violent domestic attacks and prosecutors are dropping more of these cases, placing victims at risk as potentially dangerous suspects are released from custody, a Tribune investigation has found.
The changes follow efforts by top county officials to reduce jail overcrowding and address long-standing racial inequities in bonds that can keep defendants in custody simply because they cannot pay. Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle implemented the new measures with the support of State's Attorney Kim Foxx and Chief Judge Timothy Evans.
![]()
Advocates for battered women applaud the intent of those reforms but say prosecutors and judges are now releasing suspects without fully considering the safety of domestic battery survivors.
"Reform is being pursued at the expense of the victims. They have been left out of the conversation," said Amanda Pyron, executive director of the Chicago Metropolitan Battered Women's Network.
Photo credit: Daniel Schwen.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Democrats in the Wilderness
- A Missing Person’s Alert So Identity-Specific It Stops Being Useful
- Naive Liberals
- Guardians of Liberty: Trump and the Constitution
- Supersizing the Curriculum: The University of Alabama’s Big, Fat Philosophy Class
- Massachusetts vs. the Second Amendment
- Florida Voter Fraud Case Could Overturn U.S. House Race
- Not Your Grandfather’s Foreign Aid
- Christian Morality, Migration, And The Good Samaritan
- Shaken, Not Stirred: The James Bond Complex
Blog Posts
- If Zelensky does not want to negotiate with the U.S., we will negotiate with someone else
- The David that will slay the abortion industry Goliath
- Lemon is Dead
- Could Trump abolish the income tax?
- How not to protest for ‘immigration reform’
- Trump has a point about the 14th
- The Bibas family and the antisemitic moral corruption of the world’s institutions
- It’s official: We live under the most bought-off Congress in history
- Leftist lawyer Benjamin Crump calls for crime to be legalized because it's just part of black culture
- Massachusetts schools teach antisemitism
- The deadliest mass crime wave in American history—who should be held accountable?
- Trump and Hegseth are killing it
- The death of community banks?
- Time for RFK Jr. to hit Big Pharma TV commercials
- Cloward-Piven hits the courts