Who wins the Brian Ross Trophy this week?
Back in December 2017, ABC News suspended Brian Ross for "breaking" a story that turned out to be wrong about President Trump. Ross thought he got Trump, but the truth got the newsman!
Over the last week, we saw two news stories that should cause a lot of indigestion for deans in journalism schools.
First, the New York Times published a headline about President Trump working for Russia. Unfortunately, those who actually read the story found that the text did not support the dramatic headline.
BuzzFeed ran another juicy headline about President Trump. The allegation this time was that Mr. Trump had told Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.
As expected, it caused an uproar, from Democrats to news people saying that "if true," then we got impeachment around the corner. Reserve your seats, because impeachment proceedings are coming, and very soon.
Once again, the story fell apart.
What does it mean? Professor Dershowitz nailed it with this post:
As soon as I read the explosive BuzzFeed News report alleging there was evidence that President Trump had directed his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress, I was very suspicious.
Even before the Office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller issued a statement Friday night saying that the BuzzFeed account was "not accurate," I wrote an op-ed for the New York Daily News raising questions about whether there was actually credible evidence that Trump suborned perjury or obstructed justice by telling Cohen to lie to lawmakers.
![]()
It seemed obvious that there were no smoking gun emails containing any such direction from the president. Nor would there be eyewitnesses to any such alleged conversation.
Like the professor, I was skeptical about the story.
In fact, I was invited on Friday afternoon to record a Sunday "news review" and expressed my skepticism about the story. My exact words were "let's wait and see where this goes."
I did not have to wait that long. The story was a dud in a few hours.
Over the years, I've met a lot of good newsmen and newswomen. They take their jobs seriously and do their best to research the facts.
I wonder how those serious news people feel after the New York Times' headline and BuzzFeed!
Who is going to win the next "Brian Ross Award"? Stay tuned!
PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.