Hackers challenging kids as young as 5 to penetrate voting machines
Hackers at the hacking conference DEFCON 18 are holding a contest this year for kids, awarding prizes to the first and youngest child to penetrate U.S. voting machines. The conference made headlines last year when every single machine related to voting technology was hacked – some in a matter of hours.
Their point is to show how laughable U.S. election security has become. They're doing a damn fine job of that.
Jake Braun, a former White House liaison for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, told ABC News that the conference decided to invite young hackers because it would be a "waste of time" to demonstrate that cybersecurity experts can hack election results reporting sites.
"These websites are so easy to hack we couldn't give them to adult hackers – they'd be laughed off the stage," Braun told ABC News. "They thought hacking a voter website was interesting 20 years ago. We had to give it to kids to actually make it challenging."
Joseph Lorenzo Hall, chief technologist at Washington-based nonprofit the Center for Democracy and Technology, said it wasn't at all surprising that the machines were so quickly breached at last year's conference – several were broken into within two hours, and all within two-and-a-half days – given that cybersecurity experts have known about most of the weak points for years.
Many of the most common voting machine models are more than 15 years old and run on outdated operating systems such as Windows 2000, meaning that, in some cases "the biggest barrier to hacking them was finding the right pieces of old software," Hall said.
The question isn't whether they can hack the machines. We'll take that as a given. The question is whether any hacker would be able to get into the machines and not leave any traces of his access. Given the expertise of today's forensic computer specialists, this would prove to be a challenge for all but the best hackers.
Hacking election technology in order to change the result of an election would be catastrophic for American democracy. If we can't trust the results of the elections, how can the winners receive the consent of the governed? When the fundamental tenets of American democracy are under assault, you would think the government would redouble its efforts to provide adequate election security.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8f8/9d8f844c0e34d215b7cc3ea3aed71a1523578a42" alt=""
Instead, House Republicans refused to renew election security funding. The issue has become a political football, with Democrats accusing Republicans of sabotaging American elections while Republicans accused Democrats of grandstanding, given that states already have adequate funding for security.
Republicans are probably right, but given the threat level, how much funding is too much?
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Soul of the Democrats
- Canada at the Crossroads
- Kash Patel: Poised to Lead the FBI Into a New Era
- Never Again?
- Margaret Brennan’s Face-Plant on Free Speech: Welcome to Face the Nonsense
- The Swamp is Slowly Draining
- Democrats in the Wilderness
- A Missing Person’s Alert So Identity-Specific It Stops Being Useful
- Naive Liberals
- Guardians of Liberty: Trump and the Constitution
Blog Posts
- The View and a host of others demonstrate that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing -- and no knowledge is pernicious
- America’s slavery: More complex than black and white
- Tantalizing tidbits — Five recent news stories in short form
- Democrats defend the indefensible
- Don't touch my favorite program
- DOGE takes on the Social Security monster
- Donald Trump’s latest executive order reinstates a constitutional government
- Senate aide who filmed a porno video on Capitol Hill monetizes his degeneracy and starts selling ‘content’ on OnlyFans
- North Dakota Republicans kill a bill that would have criminalized abortion
- Battling bishops sue the Trump administration for 'their' migrant millions
- The scientific method can move us a bit closer to God
- Don’t chip me, bro!
- The Trump Effect moves even the nastiest anti-Trump judges!
- Maybe we need a government shutdown
- If Zelensky does not want to negotiate with the U.S., we will negotiate with someone else