In the press, how many 'experts' and anonymous sources are imaginary?
Drew Cloud is everywhere. The self-described journalist who specializes in student-loan debt has been quoted in major news outlets, including The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, and CNBC, and is a fixture in the smaller, specialized blogosphere of student debt.
He’s always got the new data, featuring irresistible twists:
One in five students use extra money from their student loans to buy digital currencies.
Nearly 8 percent of students would move to North Korea to free themselves of their debt.
Twenty-seven percent would contract the Zika virus to live debt-free.
All of those surveys came from Cloud’s website, The Student Loan Report.
Drew Cloud’s story was simple: He founded the website, an "independent, authoritative news outlet" covering all things student loans, "after he had difficulty finding the most recent student loan news and information all in one place."
He became ubiquitous on that topic. But he’s a fiction, the invention of a student-loan refinancing company.
It appears Drew Cloud's stories on student debt were as truthful as the Russian dossier and Russian collusion story itself.

Photo Credit: Andy Mabbett, via Creative Commons SA 3.0
Think of all the stories that New York Times and Washington Post put out about Trump and "chaos" based on anonymous sources. How many times have stories come out that Trump was thinking about firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller or Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein with no actual evidence?
How many "experts" on climate change are continually wrong but just repeat their theory anyway with the media in lockstep, yet no actual evidence that the theory is true? Here is a hint for the media: If the "experts" have to repeatedly manipulate the data to get the results they want, the theory is not settled science.
Finally, when are journalists actually going to do some research instead of reporting things because it fits their agenda? Instead of quoting fake, failed or phantom 'experts,' they should do their own research and prove things before they report about them. Somehow, that just isn't convenient.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty