No, SCOTUS didn't set back Trump on DACA
Yesterday's news that the Supreme Court won't bypass the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in considering the stay on President Trump's end of President Obama's DACA program was entirely procedural, and not substantive opposition. The Trump administration argued that time was of the essence, so the Supremes should act. But the Supreme Court has an institutional bias against such shortcuts, and for good reason. The appeals courts exist to lessen the case load of SCOTUS, and SCOTUS needs to guard its time.
The Daily Wire explains why this is normal and to be expected, and even probably desirable from the standpoint of the long game.
That's not an unusual ruling – it would be unusual for the Supreme Court to step in to prevent a ruling from the courts of appeals. As NBC News notes:
The Supreme Court has agreed only about a dozen times in the past century to take a case immediately and bypass the federal appeals courts, usually involving a national emergency, such as nationwide strikes in the steel and coal industries. ... Monday's action by the Supreme Court leaves the DACA challenge pending before the California appeals court, where it is in the very early stages. The Justice Department has said it would take at least another year to get back to the Supreme Court for a decision on DACA's future.
In terms of political tactics, there may be an advantage to Trump:
[T]he Supreme Court's rejection is actually a win for the Trump administration politically, too. That's because the Trump administration will not have to start deporting DREAMers – so no nasty headlines about Trump cruelty. And meanwhile, the Trump administration will be able to claim to its supporters that it did everything in its power to stop DACA, but was thwarted by leftist courts. In essence, Trump will be able to leave DACA in place while claiming he's attempted everything to stop DACA. That, of course, isn't true. The Trump administration didn't bother asking the Supreme Court for a temporary stay of the lower court's ruling – good evidence that the administration doesn't actually want to start deportations.
President Trump is a master of the video narrative. This explanation of "the president doth protest too much, methinks" makes perfect sense.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Net Neutrality Hydra: Twice Decapitated, Still Standing
- Cloward-Piven and the Migrant Invasion
- Acting on the Lessons of History
- Is Jamie Raskin Having a Psychotic Break?
- Mother or Monster?
- Donald Trump: Right Man, Right Moment
- Trump Means to Reduce China
- Islam Is Incompatible with Democracy
- ‘Maryland Man’ Not a Maryland Man
- If Rubio Doesn’t Act, He Risks Giving the CCP Dominance over South American Shipping
Blog Posts
- What a shame to see Elon Musk returning to the private sector
- The almost-terrorist attack you didn’t hear about
- Trump’s unleashing of American energy is kneecapping China...and might just save Europe
- With Trump's agenda in peril, America is in peril
- How Republicans can score an immigration victory
- Time for Pam Bondi to get a move on
- Protecting America’s rich Christian heritage
- Europe then and now
- From 'Trump is Hitler' to dark woke?
- So Trump was right all along to use the Alien Enemies Act on Venezuela's state-linked Tren de Aragua
- Leftist judges (again) went on a rampage today
- Selfies with a corpse: Idiots take grinning cell phone photos with the body of Pope Francis, lying in state
- Buh-bye ActBlue! Trump set to sign memorandum targeting foreign dollars in American elections
- With the ‘Maryland father’ stunt failing, Democrats shift to the ‘disappeared’ Venezuelan
- Gunfight at the Oregon corral