Another episode of Obama's disregard for the law
The Obamacare subsidies worked out nicely for the Democrats. On the one hand, they got to bash Wall Street and the insurance companies. On the other hand, they got to tell people that Obamacare would take care of their illnesses.
It was great but illegal.
The "subsidies" were never part of Obamacare. My guess is that most liberals wanted no part of a vote that gave billions of dollars to the insurance industry.
Enter President Obama's pen and another excursion around the U.S. Constitution.
And now enter President Trump, and the issue will finally be settled by Congress.
It was a victory for the Constitution, as the Las Vegas Review Journal:
Recall that the Obama administration originally asked Congress to appropriate the funds as part of the Affordable Care Act. But no legislation ever made it through the House and Senate. In response, President Barack Obama's Department of Health and Human Services unilaterally began disbursing the payouts anyway. You remember that "pen and phone" thing.
House Republicans sued, arguing that the executive branch may not dole out money without congressional approval. In 2016, a federal judge issued a 38-page opinion ruling that the Mr. Obama had exceeded his constitutional authority and illegally funded the subsidies. Shocker.
"Congress is the only source for such an appropriation and no public money can be spent without one," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer. The case is currently under appeal.
![]()
To summarize: The Obama administration went around Congress and the Constitution to impose its health care plan; in contrast, President Donald Trump has decided to follow the law.
And that's the story.
Sadly, the self-described "constitutional professor" must have taught a different constitution from the one he took an oath to defend.
After all, where does it say the president can go around the Congress that refuses to authorize the payments?
The Constitution doesn't. Someone might tell that to the constitutional professor!
PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges