Why won't McCain vote for friend Lindsey Graham's Obamacare bill?
Senator John McCain announced that he will yet again vote against an effort to repeal or at least mitigate some of the worst features of Obamacare. The current effort is the Graham-Cassidy bill, which is widely understood to be a quite reasonable albeit modest improvement to our present disastrous medical insurance system.
McCain offers no substantive disagreement with the proposal, which is co-sponsored by his longtime friend, Lindsey Graham. His objection is that the bill is not bipartisan. "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried[.]"
It is worth reminding the senator of his previous effort to work with Democrats to solve a serious national problem. In 2008, then-presidential candidate McCain received word of the serious financial meltdown caused by the collapse of the housing bubble. McCain suspended his campaign and flew back to Washington to immediately work with his counterparts on a united effort to deal with the problem. The Democrats' response? They laughed at him. He was ridiculed in the national press for being so naive. Frankly, the word "naive" is an understatement.
Democrats had no incentive to do anything. Today Democrats have no incentive to help Republicans in any way. Passing a partial reform of Obamacare might provide the leverage to bring about some sort of bipartisan approach. Thanks to John McCain, we'll never know.
Senator McCain has shown great willpower during his career. He is also a pretty bright guy. Let's hope he relaxes his will enough to think through the consequences of his action. He has shown the capacity to learn. Let's all hope he can learn from his own experience.
From this point forward, the definition of the word "naive" will include a picture of John McCain. There is evidence that Democrats will not work in bipartisan way to correct the serious deficiencies in Obamacare or on any serious policy problem. Starting with the 2008 election, there is substantial evidence that Democrats will not work in a bipartisan way on even the most serious issues.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it