They were convinced Hillary was going to win and protect them
Another day and another round of stories about unmasking. The latest story is about Samantha Power, U.N. representative under President Obama:
Former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power will become the latest Obama-era official to meet with congressional investigators probing a vastly different side of the Russian election meddling story, the possibility the previous White House spied on Trump campaign and transition personnel, when she gives private testimony Friday before a congressional panel.
Earlier this year the House intelligence committee issued subpoenas to the CIA, FBI and NSA, seeking details related to alleged requests to "unmask" the identities of Trump associates swept up in U.S. surveillance operations against foreign intelligence targets.
Let's not jump to conclusions, but it smells funny, as my little sister used to say.
Were these inquiries about U.S. citizens legitimate in the context of national security? Or was the White House using its powers to destroy the opposition by learning about them and then selectively leaking to their friends in the media?
Congress should be able to investigate this and determine the intentions of people like Samantha Power.
If she acted correctly, then this story will end soon.
If she didn't, then some officials of the Obama administration need to go to jail. You cannot use the power of gathering intelligence to destroy your political opponents.
There is a story that Miss Power was "unmasking daily." What for? Why? Who was given this information, and for what purpose? Let's remember that Power was not an intelligence analyst.

If Power was playing politics, then it is further proof that the Obama team was surely convinced that Secretary Clinton would win and push all of this stuff under the rug.
PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it