Humans versus robots in a natural disaster
When I look at Hurricane Harvey, I am amazed at how all the people who are involved should be congratulated. The first responders, military, hospital workers, power company workers, people who keep stores and gas stations open, maintenance workers, truck drivers, neighbors helping neighbors, and government workers have all responded wonderfully. Churches, Red Cross, Salvation Army, animal shelters, and all other charities have chipped in greatly. Corporations are sending massive amounts of supplies, and people from around the U.S. – and, my guess, around the world – are giving huge amounts of money and goods to help the people of Texas and Louisiana recover from this huge natural disaster. All the people involved should be congratulated for their great deeds, and any looters should be harshly punished.
Then I think of things touted as the future in the U.S., artificial intelligence, robotics, and driverless cars, and how useless those things would have been during this disaster. Can anyone imagine driverless cars and semis trying to navigate and adapt to the roads and changing conditions? Would robots have rescued the people and animals and provided the needed supplies. Could artificial intelligence have worked with all the logistics and changing needs and conditions, or was human intelligence much more valuable? All electric cars are pretty useless in getting people out of harm's way if the power supply isn't working.
Humans have the intelligence to handle a situation like Hurricane Harvey. Humans also have the ability to create artificial intelligence, robots, and driverless cars, but their functions are limited as compared to the humans itself who are not replaceable.
God bless all who have been impacted by Hurricane Harvey and understand that it is humans who have the compassion and brains to work through this with the help of man-made machines.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'