The votes just aren't there for Obamacare repeal/replace
The fate of Obamacare repeal/replace part II isn't quite sealed yet, but the latest nose count among Republicans in Congress holds out little hope that this current iteration of Obamacare reform will meet the same end as the first one.
The Hill is reporting that at least 21 Republicans have indicated they are a "no vote" for the current legislation. Since 23 negative votes would scuttle the bill – unless some Democrats could be convinced to vote for it – it doesn't appear that Speaker Ryan is any more inclined to bring this version of Obamacare repeal to the floor than he was the last one.
It's unclear how dozens of other Republicans would vote this time, but the number of Republicans publicly opposed or leaning against the bill is enough to raise doubts about whether the House would pass it in its current form.
Twenty-three GOP defections would be enough to kill House Republicans' ObamaCare repeal-and-replacement plan, assuming every House Democrat votes against it.
Centrists opposed to the new bill are largely echoing Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), who said the negotiations between Meadows and MacArthur only exacerbated his earlier problems with the bill.
The legislation would allow states to opt out of some of ObamaCare's requirements and could result in people losing their current health coverage or facing much higher premiums. Dent, in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Thursday, said he worried that people with pre-existing health conditions might be left without insurance because of the changes, something supporters of the bill have fiercely denied.
Many members of the centrist Tuesday Group members [sic] complained that the MacArthur-Meadows amendment pushed the bill too far to the right, and they privately griped that MacArthur had shifted blame for the stalled healthcare effort from conservatives to centrists.
The changes seemed aimed at winning over conservatives – and those efforts proved successful.
The approximately 30-member House Freedom Caucus endorsed the new bill Wednesday after opposing the earlier legislation.
![]()
In the process, however, the new bill might have lost just as many centrists.
Vulnerable GOP Rep. Leonard Lance wouldn't criticize his fellow New Jerseyan, MacArthur, but he there was nothing leadership could do to persuade him to support the revised bill.
"I might not use the phrase 'given up,' theologically or otherwise, [but] I believe the leadership knows where I stand on this issue,'" Lance told reporters.
GOP leaders are under pressure from the White House to hold a vote by President Trump's 100th day in office, Saturday. But they say they won't bring their revised bill to the floor until they secure the 216 needed GOP votes.
And right now, they acknowledge, they don't have them.
It should be noted that the White House has not yet begun a full court press to convince doubting Republicans to vote for the measure. But if it looks this hopeless in the House, they might save their ammunition to fight another day.
There are many reasons why Republicans are so divided on what to do about Obamacare, and yes, political cowardice is one of them. But the practical aspects of ripping out Obamacare's numerous tentacles that have ensnared the entire health care system after six years of being in effect is equally to blame.
And let's face it: the American people love their goodies. Offering to subsidize the health insurance for even upper-middle-class families has an appeal that makes the GOP look like Scrooges for wanting to take those Santa Claus subsidies away.
In short, the politics of Obamacare repeal, along with the difficulty of excising most of the law from the health care system without major disruption to insurance companies and consumers, makes the GOP's job all the harder.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Deep State Anatomy and Physiology
- Sisterhood of the Traveling Pronouns
- Trump’s Tariffs: A Chance to Bring Back Lost Jobs
- Trump's Six-Point Plan for Making America Great Again
- Make IRS Sauce The Same For Both Citizen Goose and Politician Gander
- 'Battle at the Border' Documentary is an Insightful Look at Immigration
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
Blog Posts
- The Atlantic's phony migrant tear-jerker about a pitiful 'Maryland father' shipped back to El Salvador falls apart
- Rep. Luna, forgets she’s on the Republican Team!
- Veruca Salt politics or the inevitable result of ‘the personal is political’
- Taliban justice in the streets of Bordeaux, and a Sharia ‘mega city’ comes to Texas
- French judge releases an accused rapist because he’s ‘fairly integrated’
- The Luigi cult is still out there, gushing and festering
- In New York, a tax service company targets illegal aliens as potential customers for child tax credits
- When antisemitic leftists play the ‘Jewish card’
- FDA’s vaccine-rubberstamp Peter Marks forced to resign, and Big Pharma stocks take a nosedive
- Will Colorado pass what’s essentially a ‘trans blasphemy’ bill? *UPDATED*
- Elie Mystal thinks every law before 1965 should be labeled ‘unconstitutional’ and defunct
- The gift that keeps on giving
- Wasting time is hard to do – leftists still manage it
- Give Trump a chance
- Nina 'Scary Poppins' Jankowicz's ex-NGO partner makes clear 'bankrupting Tesla' is his most important accomplishment