Harvard going Orwell, protecting students from conservative websites
As someone who spent almost two decades at Harvard, first as a student and then as a member of the faculty and officer of the university, I am ashamed at how far an institution that proclaims "Truth" ("Veritas" in Latin) as its motto has fallen away from that mission. The Harvard University library system is now in the business of warning away students from polluting their minds with dissident information that might raise uncomfortable questions in Liberalville. Can't have the youngsters questioning the orthodoxy of the left!
Thus, we have the spectacle of Harvard librarians rating political websites and warning away students and faculty, lest their minds become confused by viewpoints that might disturb the liberal mindset. (For instance, remembering that when Bill Clinton fired all the U.S. attorneys, it was a normal "replacement," but when Donald Trump did the same thing, it was an outrageous "ousting" of dedicated crime-fighters.) Harvard undergraduates, too young to remember the Clinton firing, must be protected from viewpoints that might confuse them.
This graphic published by the librarians ought to be a matter of shame for the university:
"When in doubt, ask a librarian."
...because librarians are sophisticated consumers of political news, and because they have exhaustively researched each of the hundreds of websites they "rate"?
I am sorry, but this is dangerous nonsense. I was grateful for the help that the staffs of several Harvard libraries (there are dozens of libraries at Harvard) gave me in my years there. They knew what their collections contained and how to get a hold of even the most obscure items. But they always knew they were in a service role, not in the role of determining what sources I should rely on. That was my job!
How about, when in doubt, read what they have to say, read others, and make up your mind? That was what I always did.

Consider this: the Harvard librarians do not trust students to make up their own minds. Instead, they find certain viewpoints dangerous, and want to make sure that youngsters are warned away from viewpoints dissenting from liberal orthodoxy.
In actuality, it is the job of librarians to collect, organize, and store source materials for students and scholars to use in their work. It is the job of scholars and students (not librarians) to evaluate those sources and appropriately draw on them in their research and writing. At the mammoth Harvard University Library system, they seem to have forgotten this role distinction. In the age of Trump, the dangers of exposing bright young minds to information incompatible with the worldview of leftists is so great that the librarians took it upon themselves to warn away students before those viewpoints ever reach their eyes.
One of the websites the Harvard Librarians ban as "biased" is American Thinker. We have plenty of company on the right, much less on the left. Doug Ross has collected the ratings for us and a number of our colleagues:
Site |
Harvard Labels |
Real Description |
||
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
bias |
Firearm news liberals hate |
|||
hate |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
|||
political |
unreliable |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|
conspiracy |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
bias |
conspiracy |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
||
bias |
Pro-free speech group that liberals hate |
|||
political |
Urban news that liberals hate |
|||
unreliable |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
political |
Political opinions that liberals hate |
|||
political |
Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate |
|||
bias |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
|||
political |
clickbait |
unreliable |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|
bias |
Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate |
|||
political |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
conspiracy |
bias |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
||
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
political |
Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate |
|||
bias |
hate |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
||
hate |
conspiracy |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
||
bias |
Pro-business group that liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate |
|||
bias |
clickbait |
Pro-Life articles that liberals hate |
||
clickbait |
Pro-Life articles that liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
conspiracy |
fake |
bias |
News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
|
unknown |
Economic facts that liberals despise |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
bias |
unreliable |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
unknown |
Economic facts that liberals despise |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
unknown |
Economic facts that liberals despise |
|||
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
unreliable |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
bias |
conspiracy |
unreliable |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|
unknown |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|||
fake |
clickbait |
Videos of news shows that liberals hate |
||
bias |
clickbait |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
clickbait |
rumor |
Tweets that liberals hate |
||
unknown |
Politically incorrect articles that liberals hate |
|||
unreliable |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
political |
bias |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
bias |
clickbait |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
||
unknown |
Government documents that liberals hate |
|||
bias |
clickbait |
unreliable |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
|
conspiracy |
Political news and opinion liberals hate |
Missing from any hints of bias are the New York Times, NBC News, and pretty much everyone in the MSM.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it