Trump’s inaugural speech and the empty chair Democrats
Now that Inauguration Day is upon us, what should President-Elect Donald Trump do or say in response to the nonsense exhibited by Congressman John Lewis and a third or more of the House Democrats?
It would be beneath our new president to make acerbic comments about the absence of so many Democrats during the inaugural ceremonies. Absenting themselves can be seen only with the same eyes, and the same attitude, mature adults would have in watching immature children running around with their hands over their ears while screaming, “La-la-la-la-la! I can’t hear you!”
I would not, however, try to pretend that there is nothing unusual going on. I would go to the Senator Blunt, master of ceremonies for the inauguration, and insist that the sixty or so seats that were reserved for Democratic Party members not be used for anyone else. I would ask that the master of ceremonies move every single one of those seats together. And leave them together. And leave them empty. I would want them not only isolated, but able to be clearly seen and photographed, videographed, and televised as a gaping hole in the audience.
If I were the new president, I would address portions of my speech directly at those empty seats. I would tell the remaining audience members something similar to “I’m sorry that those sixty odd people are not present to hear what I’m about to say.” Then address the absent members of Congress, explaining what his goals for the nation and his plans for his administration are over the next four years.
Addressing empty chairs is not a particularly new idea. Anyone who has paid attention to politics over the past eight years, I’m sure, remembers the address by Clint Eastwood to an empty chair during the 2012 Republican convention.
The fact that President Trump would address empty chairs would plainly emphasize which of the two political parties we suffer through every day is the current source of discord and demonstrates an unwillingness to even listen to anyone else’s ideas.
It’s the kind of thing that will make ordinary citizens begin to wonder which group can be classed as mature and which must be classed as childish.
Jim Yardley is a retired financial controller, a two-tour Vietnam veteran and writes frequently about political idiocy, business and economic idiocy and American cultural idiocy. Jim also blogs at http://jimyardley.wordpress.com/, and can be contacted directly at james.v.yardley@gmail.com.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges