Treasury battles the EU for tax money
Both the NY Times and the WSJ are telling us how upset the Treasury Department and Congress are that the EU has the gall to go after Apple’s money before the U.S. can get it. They say Ireland didn’t collect enough. The most humorous quote is by Senator Charles Schumer on the front of the WSJ. He actually said the EU’s action are a “cheap money-grab” that targets U.S. business.
Just a few months ago, the Treasury Department unilaterally (without going through Congress) rewrote tax law to prevent Pfizer from merging with Allergan to move its tax headquarters to lower-tax Ireland. I did not see Schumer call that a cheap money-grab that targets U.S. companies, even though that is exactly what it was.
Something you won’t see in any of these discussions among the EU, the Treasury Department, and Congress is to allow Apple, Pfizer, and their shareholders to keep more of the money they earned when they, not the government, took all the risk and marketed the products.
There seems to be no end to the greed of politicians around the world as they make cheap money-grabs from individuals and corporations. They never seem to get enough. When they talk about individuals and corporations paying their “fair share,” there seems to be no discussion of what the fair share should be.
Here is a novel thought for Democrats in the U.S. Congress: lower corporate tax rates to more competitive levels, and reduce oppressive regulations to encourage corporations to keep and earn their money in the U.S. Maybe they should stop double-taxing earnings from overseas and stop the double-taxation of dividends. This will work much better than punishing companies if they decide to leave. The carrot works better than the stick.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.