Radical Islamists kill not because of food stamps
Jihadists kill on religious principle and because of frustrated sexual energy, not because they are deprived or jealous of the Western civilizations they look down upon.
Radical Muslims hate women, and when they are not beating, circumcising, stoning, or intentionally not educating them, they use their own pent up sexual energy to kill other people. If they kill Muslims along with Westerners in their mass murders, it doesn’t matter. Killing is its own intent. Death is a magnet that draws importance to itself.
Liberals think that if we just gave jihadists enough food stamps, they wouldn’t decapitate us. That’s right, James Foley, put your head back on.
Jihadists want fewer, not more food stamps. Sorry, Obama. They want less of life. They want to die gloriously.
Islamists want to die for principle. Liberals have no principles. They hate those who have more than them and pretend that they will be of some use to those who have less.
Terrorists are not revolutionaries. They are cruel, indiscriminate killers of innocent people. They do not use their means for ends, but luxuriate in the means of killing people with no purposeful ends. Pain is its own result. Masochism is its own depth.
The 9/11 hijackers went to strip shows, gambled, and drank alcohol. All are sins according to the Muslim religion. They were middle-class men who lived normal lives rather than ascetic lives. They were true Muslims but not fundamentalists. They were not on a pilgrimage to heaven, but a death-delivering hegira.
Heaven was a Machiavellian means, not an end, to these disturbed jihadists. Heaven is superficial. Mohammed Atta was thinking more about the glory of his death than the seventy-two virgins in heaven. The virgins would be a liberal idea, not a serious killer's.
If I were to commit suicide, I would get off on my explosion rather than some fantasy of joyful heaven. Happiness is superficial. Terrorists want depth. I would want to be torn apart to experience overwhelming power.
There is a numbness in the world. There is a numbness in mindlessness, in sleep, in constant prayer, in cocaine, in orgasm, in death. Are Muslims seeking refuge in numbness?
While Mohamed Atta and the 9/11 killers were not poor, they were also not particularly religious. They wanted to die for their religion just because they wanted to die in the embrace of sacrifice. Their fundamentalism was death, not religion. Their ideology was pain followed by the numbness of death.
The liberals who think they can reform Muslims by giving them soup kitchens are idiots. People commit suicide not because they don’t have enough soup spoons. They love the stringency of death and the cruelty of killing.
Liberals who view their enemies as friends end up inviting their enemies to kill their liberal way of life and their culture.
These terrorists got off on dedication to death rather than love of Allah. They were not celibate or abstemious. They luxuriated in sin.
Yet liberal Obama steps on the graves of three thousand Americans by saying, "Islam has always been part of America." And that we hold principles in common with Muslims.
Muslims love pain and sacrifice, not good feelings and high times. They like to blow innocent people up, not give them affordable housing and charity.
Islamists are the opposite of what liberals are supposed to be, and yet both are drawn to each other.
Jihadists are not poor. Liberals cannot pigeonhole them into some sort of welfare culture. They are angry not because they don’t have enough food stamps. They are angry because they hate Western culture.
Jihadists specialize in hate. Our existence infuriates them. They cannot be reformed. They are a culture of anger and a marching band of death.
Mohammed was born in 570. The Muslim religion is a neophyte compared to Judaism and Christianity. Maybe it will take a couple more millennia for the Muslims to develop a conscience and a sense of proportion.