Prosecuting free speech
The U.S. attorney general and the Democrat attorneys general in several states are indicating that they are considering legal action against people who believe that current climate change is natural and cyclical, as it has been throughout billions of years, instead of caused by humans. Is it any wonder that scientists who are skeptics won’t come forward when their livelihood is threatened?
I can’t imagine the outrage by the media, Democrats, professors, and scientists if the government were threatening legal action against anyone who disagreed with the statement that human life begins at conception.
The founding fathers considered free speech and a free press so important that both was put in the First Amendment to the Constitution. They did not want the government to control the message.
It is a very slippery slope when the government says not only that people who disagree with them should not be listened to, but that they should be forced to shut up.
Lois Lerner at the IRS intentionally blocked applications from political opponents of the president to stifle their ability to raise funds and voice opposition to Obama’s policies prior to the 2012 election. Lerner was found in contempt of Congress, which legally requires the Justice Department to take the case to a grand jury. The Justice Department ignored the law and dismissed the case without taking it to a grand jury.
Recently, President Obama was speaking to schoolchildren in Argentina and said there is not much difference between communism and capitalism – just choose what works. Communism does not allow freedom of speech.
Everyone should wake up, especially the media, to the fact that our freedoms are being rapidly diminished, especially freedom of speech.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot