So Hillary doesn't propose to ban the manufacture of guns but thinks the manufacturer should be liable in the event someone uses the gun to kill somebody.

I wonder if she would support legislation making firms like Goldman Sachs liable when they sell financial products that blow up critical financial institutions?  I wonder if she would support such legislation making them liable if it were shown that they knew or should have known this result was probable?  I wonder if she would be willing to include the firm's management in the liability?   

I bet she wouldn't. But it would be fun to have her explain why in a opresidential debate.