Other people's kids
It has been well-known for years in conservative circles that the left is extremely charitable with other people’s money. In fact, liberals are notorious for their dearth of personal charity, instead favoring government programs that personally cost them nothing. Look to Vice President Biden’s recent income tax returns showing a near total lack of personal charitable contributions. It is a curious but undeniable characteristic of the left, stemming perhaps from a cast-aside of personal responsibility for their fellow man, in favor of collective responsibility. This certainly holds true for a great many, and it grows from a philosophical underpinning of their entire philosophy, that government – not you – is your brother’s keeper.
What is fascinating from a purely philosophical perspective – and chilling from a personal perspective – is that the left has graduated from other people’s money to other peoples’ kids. In its counterintuitive, if not psychotic, love affair with militant Islamism, the left now seems willing to not simply spend your money, but also roll the dice with your kids.
Think for a second: the chances of a terrorist incident affecting any particular individual leftist – or their progeny – is miniscule. They get that. The next incident, when it comes, will affect somebody’s kids, but not theirs. And they’re good with that. When the next ISIS disciple shoots up a mall/school/movie theater/stadium, well, that’s horrible – but acceptable. Acceptable because you really expect the sociopathic ambitions of a billion-some adherents to remain contained, especially if the foremost goal is to minister to their social needs/politico-religious sensibilities/travel plans. But also acceptable to the left because it really didn’t affect them or theirs personally.
Now, if some enterprising caliphate-aspirer managed to take out large swaths of Georgetown and Chevy Chase, maybe that would be different, but really, how likely is that? Meanwhile, we all need to buck up, do our part, and sacrifice whoever needs sacrificing so that we can achieve peace without seeking to offend.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
- There’s Nothing Free about ‘Free Trade’
- The U.S, Denmark, and Greenland: Irreconcilable Differences?
- Announcing the New World Trading Order
- Free Trade: Reagan and the Austrians vs. the World of Today
- Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Screams for Department of Justice Criminal Investigation
- Too Little, Too Late
Blog Posts
- Pigs at the Trough: SoCal food bank accused of using food funds for cars, trips to Vegas, and more
- The Darién Gap is now… a ghost town?
- Deportation scoreboard
- Jerome Powell wants ‘hard data’ about tariffs and inflation before he lowers interest rates—so here it is
- The leftist elites are controlling their minions through performance art
- Would-be NJ governor gets a poor reception from the grassroots
- The emerging Trump Trade Doctrine
- Why April 19 for the next far-left fascist freakout?
- The idealized past
- Tariffs are NOT a tax
- Don’t forget Lexington and Concord
- It's too late, George
- A new lawsuit seeks to stop the open pro-Palestinian/anti-Jewish indoctrination in the Oakland Unified School District
- 'Boys will be boys' -- Musk-Navarro spat demonstrates the Trump administration is pretty ... adult
- Trump’s tariff plan is coming into focus, as all the world but for China gets relief