The Clinton-Trump Connection
Several in the media have speculated that Trump is somehow connected to Clinton in his decision to campaign as a Republican.
Now WaPo confirms it:
Former president Bill Clinton had a private telephone conversation in late spring with Donald Trump at the same time that the billionaire investor and reality-television star was nearing a decision to run for the White House, according to associates of both men.
Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that Clinton encouraged Trump’s efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and offered his own views of the political landscape.
It all makes sense. Only recently did he self-identify as a Democrat and donate a lot of money to them and contribute around $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Imagine if Jeb had done that! So why does Trump get away with it? Maybe because he “tells it like it is!” (whatever the two “its” mean), and he's “refreshing.”
Further, he went up to Wisconsin and criticized Scott Walker (a “disaster!”), using the left’s talking points, railing against a man who heroically won three elections against the virulent left in four years. Walker curtailed the government unions’ power and restored the state budget, but that’s a bad thing, for liberal-masquerading-as-conservative Trump.
Many Republicans are fearful that Trump is hurting their brand. It may satisfy some conservatives to hurt this party, but as Jonah Goldberg points out, conservatives are always RINOs. We’re conservatives first, but we use the GOP as a vehicle to approximate implementing conservative policies – though, I add, gradually and over time. No party is perfect.
Trump, on the other hand, is far from perfect. His journey shows him to be a rootless, opportunistic, wandering political soul.
He might be destined to run as a spoiler and give the White House to the Democrat. Billionaires with huge egos don't go away quietly. Just think of Ross Perot, who, many believe, cost George H.W. Bush the election, according to a state-by-state analysis.

AT readers must be careful they don't fall for him.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.