Satan v. the People
One of the truest adages in politics is the one about “strange bedfellows.” So it should come as no surprise that saddling up beside pro-abortion Democrats is a Satanist group.
LifeSiteNews reports that the “Satanic Temple” of New York is suing the state of Missouri, claiming the state’s abortion laws violate the group’s First Amendment rights to freedom of religion.
The suit identifies abortion as an essential religious duty for Satanists.
Missouri's "informed consent" law educates women about the facts of abortion and what's going on inside her body, and its 72-hour waiting period between initial contact and the major surgery of abortion is intended to give mothers time to think the information over before having irreversible, elective surgical procedure.
The individual that the Satanists are using to bring their lawsuit, "Mary Doe," went to the St. Louis Planned Parenthood pregnant, and submitted a letter stating that her religious beliefs in Satanism require no informed consent and no waiting period before abortion.
She demanded, on religious grounds, "to have an abortion today -- now -- and without further review of the [informed consent] Booklet." Her letter explained her belief that "both as a religious and a scientific matter... an abortion will not terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being."
The federal lawsuit, filed Tuesday, says the Constitution's freedom of religion includes the "Freedom to Believe When Human Life Begins," regardless of the scientific facts, medical information and basic biology presented in Missouri's "informed consent" materials.
As disconnected from logic and reason as their arguments are, given the Supreme Court’s recent rulings on gay marriage (a new right springing into existence) and Obamacare (state exchanges actually mean state or federal exchanges), the Satanists’ suit can’t be simply dismissed. Perhaps the devil is in the details!
Seriously and soberly, the identification of “abortion as an essential religious duty for Satanists” is chilling. All the more so given the revelations of Planned Parenthood trafficking in the body parts of babies. And the nonchalant, unemotional manner in which Dr. Nucatola discussed it…sipping a glass of red wine, in the spirit of Dr. Mengele.

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction