'Run, Warren Run' group will suspend operations
The chances of Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren running for president – already a long shot – appeared to all but disappear when the group promoting her candidacy decided to suspend operations on June 8.
Two liberal activist groups trying to draft Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts into the 2016 presidential race are officially suspending the effort next week.
The groups Democracy for America and MoveOn.org had launched the campaign in December 2014. They said Tuesday that on June 8, supporters will deliver to Ms. Warren a petition with more than 365,000 signatures asking her to enter the presidential race and then “rest their case and suspend their draft effort,” turning their focus to fighting alongside Ms. Warren on issues like a trade deal with Pacific Rim nations that has pitted President Obama against liberals in his own party.
The campaign touted opening field offices in Iowa and New Hampshire and building a network of grassroots leaders in those early states, as well as holding more than 400 events since the launch.
“Even without her in the race, Elizabeth Warren and the Run Warren Run campaign she inspired have already transformed the 2016 presidential election by focusing every single Democratic candidate on combatting our country’s income inequality crisis,” said Charles Chamberlain, executive director of Democracy for America.
“We still think there’s plenty of time for Sen. Warren to change her mind, but now that we’ve shown that she has the support she would need to mount a winning a campaign, we’re excited to take the grassroots juggernaut we’ve built with our members and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Warren in the battles ahead,” she said.
The entry of Vermont socialist Senator Bernie Sanders into the race for the Democratic nomination all but guaranteed that Warren would sit 2016 out. The far-left liberal activists who support Warren are just as happy siding with Sanders.
But Warren poses a bigger threat to Hillary Clinton because of her sex and because she has adopted the issue of income inequality and made it her own. Her anti-Wall Street, anti-rich rants have resonated powerfully with the Democratic Party left, and while they will support Sanders, their hearts still belong with Warren.

Hillary Clinton would have had a formidable challenge from Warren. She has better name recognition than Martin O'Malley and could have raised far more money than Sanders. No doubt, Mrs. Clinton is breathing a sigh of relief at the news that it's all but certain Warren will not be on the ballot.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
- There’s Nothing Free about ‘Free Trade’
- The U.S, Denmark, and Greenland: Irreconcilable Differences?
- Announcing the New World Trading Order
- Free Trade: Reagan and the Austrians vs. the World of Today
- Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Screams for Department of Justice Criminal Investigation
- Too Little, Too Late
Blog Posts
- Don’t forget Lexington and Concord
- It's too late, George
- A new lawsuit seeks to stop the open pro-Palestinian/anti-Jewish indoctrination in the Oakland Unified School District
- 'Boys will be boys' -- Musk-Navarro spat demonstrates the Trump administration is pretty ... adult
- Trump’s tariff plan is coming into focus, as all the world but for China gets relief
- Acting IRS commissioner takes a buy-out in protest because she doesn’t want DHS to know where the illegal aliens are
- 18 months to save the world
- A young boy is murdered, and the accused has a history of assaulting children—oh, and he’s also an illegal
- From Tuskegee to tap water: Why government health promises deserve scrutiny
- Rep. Ocasio-Cortez flies first class for the common man
- Do we need a national ID card?
- In the trade war, a revealing Chinese video attacks American workers
- Trump’s tariff brilliance
- Hands off our liberty, leftists!
- The Democrat party’s transgender albatross problem