After 15 years of silence and cover-ups, the New York Times has confessed what it has known all along: that Saudi Arabia was complicit, to say the least, in the mass murder of 3,000 innocent civilians on 9/11/01 in New York City; in Washington, D.C.; and in Pennsylvania.

That has been obvious for more than a decade, since all but one of the mass murdering throat-slitting hijackers were Saudi Muslims, all of them brainwashed by the Wahhabi war cult that runs the Saudi war theology, as finally shown to the whole world by hundreds of ISIS Wahhabi videos.

I don’t know how the Saudis are going to survive the grinning legions of Iranian aggressors now at their borders.  I don’t know if they should survive.  But the Iranians are going to be much worse than even the Saudis have been.

Truthful analysts and bloggers have risked their lives for 15 years to expose what the NYT has finally confessed.  Some of them have died in jihadist murder sprees.  A Mohammed cartoon contest run by Pamella Geller, Geert Wilders, and Robert Spencer was just assaulted by two heavily armed Muslim suicide-killers.  Fortunately, a single Texas security guard advanced in the face of bigger firepower and shot both of them dead with his service pistol.  The anti-jihad truth-tellers were saved by the Texas cops – and the lefto-fascist media immediately blamed the victims.  As they always do.

The New York Times has not – repeat: not – just had a fit of journalistic honesty.  Honesty isn’t in their playbook.  They leaked this story at this time for specific political goals.

I have four questions, just for starters.

1. Why did the U.S. government fail to expose the Saudi assault on America, the worst peacetime assault on the United States since Pearl Harbor?
2. Why did the Democrat-run media cover up the facts for 15 years?
3. Why did the Democrat-run NYT finally dump this story at this particular time?  (Hint: It’s election time, Hillary is vulnerable, and Obama runs the One Party Media).
4. Who will get blamed politically, and who is going to get away with impeachable crimes?

But you know the last three answers already.

A huge blame game is now roiling the One Party Media.  With its long-delayed exposé, the New York Times published a photo showing George W. Bush with the Saudi royals after 9/11.

But it was Bill Clinton who failed to catch Osama bin Laden after the first truck bombing of the Twin Towers – even after Arab countries offered bin Laden on a plate to the U.S. for certain favors.  Bill ducked every single time.  It is Hillary who made Huma Abedin her personal assistant – now sure to be  publicly accused of being an Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) agent.  It was Obama who tried to overthrow Egypt’s peace-keeping military dynasty in favor of the Islamofascist Ikhwan.  It is Obama who is now about to sign a completely phony surrender “treaty” to the brutal and sadistic mullahs to let them go ahead with nuclear weapons.  It is Obama who has surrendered large parts of the Middle East to Iran already.  It is Obama and Hillary who colluded with the Ikhwan and al-Qaeda to surrender Iraq, Syria, and Libya to the murder battalions.

And it was Jimmy Carter who has been taking millions of dollars for four decades from the Ikhwan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, to agitate for American surrender to the Muslim reactionary tide.  Finally, it is our political media – wholly owned by the Democrats and left-fascist creatures like George Soros – who have covered up the secret truth for fifteen years.

Yet George W. Bush does have a lot of explaining to do – along with Bill and Hillary, Barack Hussein Obama, and the whole corrupt foreign policy establishment since Jimmy Carter.  They are legally innocent until proven guilty.  But after what’s happened, I personally consider them dirty as hell until proven innocent.

Let the investigations begin.