Kerry on Governance
In an October 16 speech commemorating the Islamic Eid al-Adha celebration (Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son in accordance with the will of God) at the State Department, Kerry blamed ISIS violence on everything from climate change to lack of proper education to government corruption -- in other words to everything but Islamic doctrine. This has been well covered. But his remarks also reveal a succinct way of differentiating the progressive/liberal approach to the role of government from the conservative approach to the role of government. Here is the key remark:
… the underlying causes which go to this question of governance and corruption and a whole issue of how you meet the needs of people.
The key phrase here is “how [government] meets the needs of people.” The principle being: the proper role of government is to structure society to meet the needs of people.
For the progressive, the role of government is to try to meet the needs of people. That seems not only a fair but a rather innocuous truism. But government then become the arbiter of which needs are legitimate and who gets what and that in turn leads “progressively” to ensuring that people have the proper mindset to accept the government redistributionist scheme. The Orwellian Ministry of Just Deserts looms on the horizon.
If the seemingly innocuous concept of a government which meets the needs of people is contrasted with the conservative view of government -- expressed in the same terms -- then the great divide between the two becomes readily apparent.
The proper role of government is to structure society to enable people to meet their own needs.
It is a vast divide. And ne’re the twain shall meet. And they both have their demons. The progressive/collectivist model, even at its best, can lead to a stultifying, dreary and unproductive equality. The conservative/individualist model, even at its best, can lead to an extreme and entrenched inequality.
Together they form the Scylla and Charybdis of governance and therein lies the challenge.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues