Decarbonization Equals Lower Economic Growth
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) has released a report on the 2014 Low Carbon Economy Index and the world's progress towards "decarbonization," which is a measure of the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of GDP (h/t Brad Plumer at Vox.com).
According to the PwC report, "to meet the global carbon budget necessary to limit warming to 2 C, the global economy needs to increase decarbonization to 6.2 percent a year, every year to 2100." For context, the annual average change in carbon intensity for the world's economy between 2008 and 2013 was only -0.6 percent per year, or more than an order of magnitude slower than what the PwC report claims is required to avoid warming the planet by more than two degrees.
The PwC report also contains comparative economic growth and decarbonization rates between 2008 and 2013 for the global economy, the EU, G7, and the E7 emerging economies.
Two key points are apparent from this PwC data.
First, there is a direct negative correlation between the rate of decarbonization and economic growth – the faster the decarbonization, the slower the economic growth, and vice versa.
Second, once the rate of decarbonization drops below 2% per year (as we saw with the EU), economic growth turns negative. This suggests that a decarbonization rate of 6.2% annually would lead to a rapid and continuous contraction of any economy that attempts to follow the path.
We've seen this story before. British Columbia's economy was significantly harmed by carbon taxation in its attempt to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as was that of Denmark. Australia introduced a carbon tax, and its unemployment rate immediately shot up. And among the G7, greater carbon dioxide reductions correlate strongly with reduced economic growth.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell