White House scrambles to 'clarify' Obama's 'no strategy' remark
Following the president's press conference where he admitted he didn't have a strategy to deal with Islamic State, White House aides frantically called reporters and sent aides to talk with cable news to "clarify" Obama's remark.
President Obama was referring only "to military options for striking" Islamist militants in Syria when he said the White House did not "have a strategy yet,” press secretary Josh Earnest insisted Thursday.
The White House launched a full-court media press to clarify the president’s comments after the media and Republicans seized on the admission.
In an interview with CNN, Earnest said Obama was only referring to potential military strikes within Syria.
"Those options are still being developed by the Pentagon," Earnest said.
He added that Obama "was asked a specific question about what approach he was going to pursue about possible military action in Syria."
The White House spokesman said Obama had for months described a "comprehensive strategy" to deal with the threat posed by terrorists from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), who have established a foothold in both countries.
"Our strategy is much broader than just the use of military force," Earnest said.
![]()
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki appeared shortly after Earnest on the network, also looking to clean up the president's remarks.
"I think it's important to note here that the president has already begun implementing his strategy to defeat [ISIS]," Psaki said, noting that the administration was working toward "building international coalitions" to combat the terror group.
Separately, Earnest took to social media to argue in a series of six tweets the president "was explicit — as he has been in the past — about the comprehensive strategy that we'll use to confront" the threat posed by ISIS.
White House aides began quickly contacting reporters just minutes after the press conference looking to explain the president's comments.
One White House official said Obama was "candid" in describing the strategy during his press conference. The official noted that the president said he had directed the Joint Chiefs of Staff to prepare a range of options and that he planned to meet later Thursday with his National Security Council staff to "continue to develop that strategy."
Pray tell, how can you have a "comprehensive strategy" when the most important element of that strategy - military action - is missing?
There is nothing "comprehensive" about anything this president has ever done in foreign affairs. It is an entirely reactive White House that responds to crisis in an ad hoc manner. What's our overall strategy in Iraq that will keep that country from flying apart? And don't even mention Ukraine.
For a man who is supposed to be smart. he doesn't appear to think deeply about much of anything.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty