Iraq - ISIL/ISIS and the U.S. Humanitarian Aid Mission
The humanitarian mission that began Thursday night was conducted over Iraq’s northern Kurdish region. It included air drops by two C-130 and one C-17 cargo aircraft escorted by two F/A-18 Super Hornets, from the USS George H. W. Bush carrier group in the northern Persian Gulf. said.
The operation was led by U.S. Central Command and so far involved the dropping of pallets of food, water and other supplies over the Sinjar mountain where approximately 40,000 Iraqis from the Yazidi minority are stranded and trapped by forces of the radical Islamic State - aka ISIL/ISIS. U.S. aircraft spent about 15 minutes flying at a low altitude over the drop zone, exposed to militants who have surface-to-air weapons. In total the air drop last night included about 8,000 meals ready to eat (MRE) and 5,300 gallons of drinking water. Additional air drops will continue “as needed,” according to DoD officials. However, it’s going to take more than that amount to assist the 40,000.
Additionally, no air strikes occurred Thursday, even though strikes have been authorized against ISIL/ISIS militant ground units threatening the Kurdish city of Irbil, where U.S. State Department officials operate a consulate and diplomatic mission. There are also 40 U.S. troops on the ground there manning a joint operations center at the location to coordinate operations.
Protecting the city of Irbil and the U.S. citizens there is the most “urgent priority,” but Obama also authorized air strikes on ISIS forces surrounding the Yazidis to help break the siege that is putting those Iraqis at risk. Administration officials signaled that air strikes and humanitarian drops will continue until the siege is broken.
Also, note the Iraqi air force attempted some air drops earlier this week with limited success because aerial delivery operations are both fairly difficult and sophisticated.
There are between 800-1,000 U.S. military personnel in Iraq, most of them in Baghdad. About 300 are special operations troops whose primary mission is to gather intelligence, and about 400 are providing security for U.S. diplomats at the embassy in the Green Zone and the Baghdad airport. There are additional, U.S. private/contract security elements, which are made up of former and retired U.S. military members.
The worst point, as usual, as is with this Administration is that yesterday the White House emphasized the limited nature of the mission, saying “We are not launching a sustained U.S. campaign against [the Islamic State] here.”
The other comment s to be aware of are, as noted; “When the lives of American citizens are at risk, we will take action,” Obama said last night from the White House. “To stop the advance on Irbil, I’ve directed our military to take targeted strikes against [Islamic State] terrorist convoys should they move toward the city.”
However, Obama repeated his vow not to put combat troops on the ground in Iraq, saying; “I will not allow the United States to be dragged into fighting another war in Iraq,” the president said. “American combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq, because there’s no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq. The only lasting solution is reconciliation among Iraqi communities and stronger Iraqi security forces.”

In authorizing the humanitarian mission, Obama said he was moved by the “chilling reports [of militants] rounding up families, conducting mass executions and enslaving Yazidi women.” “When we have the unique capabilities to help avert a massacre, then I think the United States cannot turn a blind eye,” Obama said.
The most compelling and damaging point he stressed was; “…there’s no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq. The only lasting solution is reconciliation among Iraqi communities and stronger Iraqi security forces.”
That is absolutely absurd and represents a policy of weakness - a direct interpretation of a policy of retrenchment - and to essentially ignore the problem at the strategic level. The fact that the President said that and the White House actually allowed him to publically say those words, is insane The strategic message it sends to the world, to the Jihadists, and to the people suffering at the hands of radical Islam, is devastating. It's another pronouncement of America’s weakness that only further emboldens our adversaries everywhere.
Jim Waurishuk
Colonel, USAF (Ret.)
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump-O-Phobia Drives Some Americans to Questionable Greener Pastures Overseas
- A Businessman and a Brilliant Strategist
- A Remarkable Headline for a Fascinating Story
- Democrats Unmask Themselves
- How Mexico Became China’s Trojan Horse in U.S. Trade
- Covid Redux: The Bird Flu Scare
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
Blog Posts
- Speaker Mike Johnson reveals why the Autopen scandal is a big deal
- The CDC website really needs to update its COVID protocols
- Hands in your back pocket
- Birthright citizenship: The facts
- ‘She’s my little Musk coupe’
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?