Court strikes down DC ban on openly carrying guns
In a big victory for Second Amendment supporters, a federal court in Washington, D.C. has struck down a local ordinance against openly carrying handguns.
The judge, Frederick Scullin, didn't mince any words:
In a 19-page opinion, Judge Frederick Scullin ruled on Saturday that "there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny.
"Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia's complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional."
It is unclear if the defendants -- the District of Columbia as represented by Police Chief Cathy Lanier -- will appeal the ruling.
The lawsuit plaintiffs included two Washington residents who were denied permits to openly carry handguns for self-defense.
Washington DC, the District of Columbia, is wedged between the states of Virginia -- which allows people to openly carry a gun -- and Maryland, which has stricter rules on gun ownership.
Currently 44 of the 50 US states allow people to openly carry handguns.
In his ruling Scullin made reference to the 2008 US Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, in which the plaintiff argued that the city's ban on firearm ownership -- one of the strictest in the nation -- was unconstitutional.
![]()
In a 5-4 decision the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Dick Anthony Heller, a local police officer who wanted to have a private weapon at home.
At the national level, gun control efforts have utterly failed. But at the state and local level, there is still much to do. A good start would be to elect pro-Second Amendment legislators and governors to repeal some of the onerous legislation passed in the panic after the Sandy Hook school shooting.
The political fallout from gun control efforts in Colorado included the recall of the state senate president and anothe state senator. And recent polls suggest Democratic Governor John Hickenlooper may be in trouble in his re-election campaign, running neck and neck with GOP nominee Bob Beauprez.
But ultimately, this is a battle for the courts to decide. And recent history suggests the winning streak for pro-gun forces will continue.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Is Australia Set to Become a Security Threat for the United States?
- The Imperial Judiciary Of The United States
- Sanders and AOC: 100 Years of Socialism
- The Trump Administration Goes to War against Bureaucratic Tyranny
- The Supreme Court Must Recognize That The Executive’s Great Powers Also Mean Smaller Powers
- Live by the Autopen, Die by the Autopen
- Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
- The 250th Birthday of Patrick Henry’s ‘Liberty or Death’ Speech
- Iranian Regime’s Nuclear Crisis and Diplomatic Tensions: Negotiation or Confrontation?
- Iraq’s Debt to America: It’s Time to Collect
Blog Posts
- The media’s latest lie: TikTok stole Kamala’s presidency
- Usha Vance goes to Greenland -- just as the normally polite Danes are getting pretty hostile
- Why do we think the way we do?
- All we need is Joe, Joe is all we need?
- Bernie's astroturf rally
- Remembering an inspiring story about Sir Michael Caine
- Are Turkish President Recip Erdoğan's days numbered?
- Leftists are finally embracing their Inner Fascist
- In praise of Elon Musk
- For 47 years, I’ve dreamed of what Trump is doing now
- Tim Walz, Minnesota’s manic Marxist governor, has the reverse Midas touch
- Democrats’ ambivalence about healthy authority in America
- The Department of Education: A perspective from 1979
- How much did Joe know?
- President Trump and unitary power