A nation of immigrants
We are told by Liberals that we should not be concerned about the current immigrant invasion of the U.S. because, after all, we are a “nation of immigrants.”
Not in the way that Libs mean it. Past immigrants to America have left failed cultures that immigrants knew were failures. That is why they left them to come to America. They came here to join the American culture of achievement and private property which lets them benefit from their achievements. They left cultures of tyranny to join America’s culture of liberty.
Immigrants on the southern border currently are not in this tradition. Far from admitting they are leaving failed cultures to join a successful one, they seek to bring their failed cultures with them, to transplant them here. Roughly speaking, Latin American countries were colonized by Spain 100 years before what became the U.S. was colonized by Britain. The entire continent of South America predates us by a century. And yet, what has it produced politically and economically? Chaos and failure. There is no public interest for us to let that culture be transplanted here.
A culture of chaos and failure is indistinguishable from Democratic programs because they seek the same result – devastation and despair, which generates permanent client constituencies for Democratic politicians. This is the purpose of Great Society welfare programs, which have devastated the family structure of their recipients. So it is not surprising that the Democratic Party in general and Obama in particular should wish to see a culture of failure transplanted here.
Obama himself, as Dinesh D’Souza has pointed out, is not so much our first black president as our first third-world president. Obama’s experience is not that of the American black experience in any meaningful sense. He has been raised to resent not our failures, but our successes, which, in line with neocolonialist philosophy, thinks we obtained by theft rather than achievement. Obama is indeed a reflection of the dreams of his father, which, when examined, turn out to be a desire to join the third-world oligarchy in a society of a few well-connected rich and the rest poor, rather than the desire to build a middle-class society of limited government and individual achievement. Importing people in thrall to third-world social failure is completely consistent with Obama’s goals.
But not with ours. We have to find all the ways we can to resist this “transformation of America,” in the words of our president, until we can replace him at the polls. This immigration is not that of the “nation of immigrants.”
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'
- Pro-abortionists amplify an aborton protest's impact