Deal reached on Ukraine. Will it hold?
The deal reached in Geneva between Ukraine and Russia pretty much rings the death knell for an independent Ukraine. The Ukrainian government will have to negotiate a plan with pro-Russian separatists that grants some provincesr greater autonomy - which means Kiev will be negotiating with Putin. All pro-Russian separatists will have to lay down their arms and vacate buildings they've occupied, while the government will grant amnesty to all except those accused of a capital crime.
President Obama expressed optimism that the framework was a positive step, but he acknowledged it was unclear whether separatists on the ground would follow through.
"We're not going to know whether in fact they'll follow through on these statements for several days," he said at a White House press conference.
Kerry agreed the agreement is a "good day's work," he said leaders understood that, so far, it's only "words on paper."
Obama and Kerry have repeatedly accused Russia of stirring up unrest in Ukraine, and they said they would hold Russia accountable if things did not improve. The president specifically suggested tougher sanctions could be imposed.
"We have put in place additional consequences we can impose on the Russians if we do not see actual improvement on the ground," Obama said. "We have to be prepared to potentially respond to what continue to be efforts at interference."
Some outside observers raised questions about whether the agreement would really commit Russia to much of anything.
Ukraine expert Anders Aslund of the Peterson Institute noted that the deal did not require Russia to move troops it has amassed on Ukraine's border.He also said that because pro-Russian militants were not party to the deal, Russia could continue to secretly use them to de-stabilize Ukraine while claiming their hands were clean.“What this means is that the West has accepted to be bluffed,”he said. “What will Putin say? He will say what he already said: ‘Sorry but the people fighting in the streets are behind the violence and they were not at the table so how can this apply to them?’”Steve Pifer of the Brookings Institution, however, said the deal is better than expected."The big question is whether it will be implemented, and much will depend on whether Moscow does it part to defuse the crisis," he said. "Given all that Russia has done the past several weeks to crank up pressure and destabilize Ukraine, people are understandably dubious about Moscow's commitment to fulfill the statement."

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- The unravelling of our Western Judeo/Christian civilization
- Chief Justice Roberts, Norm Eisen, and the appearance of impropriety
- Trump’s tariffs aren’t chaos; they’re a course correction after Biden’s drift
- Tim Walz calls Elon Musk 'a loser'
- Taming the military-transfer complex
- Could it be that Trump really knows what he’s doing?
- Tariffs: Burn it all down, rule over the ashes
- Adobe meltdown
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Tesla vandals and keeping the republic
- The Nashville Police report--sort of
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black