Who decides not to enforce Federal Law?
In the history of our nation this occurrence seemed exclusive to the healthy friction between Federal and State laws per the supremacy clause and the 14th amendment. States might have contested a Federal Law which they deemed harmful to their citizenry.
Yet in today's world, we are getting the reverse. States such as Arizona wish the federal government to enforce the immigration laws that are on the federal books and the federal government seems disinterested and lax. It is as if they are opting not to enforce federal law. Immigration officers are told to "stand down".
Sanctuary cities are encouraged do disregard federal law by the likes of Nancy Pelosi and that while serving as Speaker of the House. This is essentially the "third in line" for the Presidency telling people to disregard the law.

Now we learn the federal government chooses not to contest the State laws that allow marijuana usage. Personally, I don't care either way. But one must wonder who decides not to enforce federal law. Is this another Executive Order event? Is it an agreement between Holder and Obama to disregard yet more laws on the books?
And what of the oath of office, where promises are made to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the nation? It didn't phase Harry Reid's disregard for a Senate Budget.
We have come to an era where the enforcement of laws on the books seems a "choice" by the administration in power. Can there be a more lucid portrayal of a system in decline?
Next lawmakers will be passing laws to which they are not subject, and will pick and choose who must obey and who is released from the legal obligation. From where do these new powers emanate?
When Liberals and Progressives declare the Constitution is a "living and breathing" document, brace yourself for an event that disregards or ignores the Constitution. The "old guys in powdered wigs" saw this coming, but expected more resolve from the representatives of the People. However, that was before money imbedded itself in our political system.
The starting point for these antics is a breach of the oath of office which apparently has morphed into a mere formality. Right.... Nancy, Eric and Barack?
Bruce Johnson
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Net Neutrality Hydra: Twice Decapitated, Still Standing
- Cloward-Piven and the Migrant Invasion
- Acting on the Lessons of History
- Is Jamie Raskin Having a Psychotic Break?
- Mother or Monster?
- Donald Trump: Right Man, Right Moment
- Trump Means to Reduce China
- Islam Is Incompatible with Democracy
- ‘Maryland Man’ Not a Maryland Man
- If Rubio Doesn’t Act, He Risks Giving the CCP Dominance over South American Shipping
Blog Posts
- The jig is up! Newsom busted for blowing state Medicaid dollars on homeless housing
- What a shame to see Elon Musk returning to the private sector
- The almost-terrorist attack you didn’t hear about
- Trump’s unleashing of American energy is kneecapping China...and might just save Europe
- With Trump's agenda in peril, America is in peril
- How Republicans can score an immigration victory
- Time for Pam Bondi to get a move on
- Protecting America’s rich Christian heritage
- Europe then and now
- From 'Trump is Hitler' to dark woke?
- So Trump was right all along to use the Alien Enemies Act on Venezuela's state-linked Tren de Aragua
- Leftist judges (again) went on a rampage today
- Selfies with a corpse: Idiots take grinning cell phone photos with the body of Pope Francis, lying in state
- Buh-bye ActBlue! Trump set to sign memorandum targeting foreign dollars in American elections
- With the ‘Maryland father’ stunt failing, Democrats shift to the ‘disappeared’ Venezuelan