The Zimmerman Trial? It's That Simple
If you begin with the conviction that Zimmerman is a racist then the trial was a gross miscarriage of justice. The conviction lends credence to the narrative that Trayvon was just innocently walking through a white neighborhood and that Zimmerman deliberately stalked Trayvon and wanted to intimidate him and get him arrested because he was black. That further lends credence to the narrative that Zimmerman started the altercation. That Zimmerman got the worst of the fight served him right and Trayvon taught him a lesson he deserved. Trayvon would have punched him out and left him banged up but alive. Losing a fight - especially one you start - is no basis for shooting someone. Zimmerman, then, had no basis to shoot Trayvon and at the very least deserved a manslaughter conviction.
If you begin with the conviction that Zimmerman was not a racist the trial was a fair and just outcome. The conviction lends credence to the narrative that Zimmerman was just doing his duty as community watchman and was just discretely keeping an eye on him and that it was Trayvon who jumped him and started the altercation. Not only is it unlikely that Zimmerman started the altercation, he took a terrible beating and had reason to fear for his life and the result is justifiable homicide.
If you suspend judgment about whether Zimmerman is a racist then sufficient evidence as to whether Zimmerman, in his heart of hearts, is a racist did not emerge and you have to go on the evidence in its simplest form uncolored by either narrative. In that case it cannot be entirely clear as to who started the altercation but it is clear that Zimmerman had reason to fear for his life in the beating he took, and, as that basically is the best evidence to go on, the result is a somewhat uncomfortable insufficient evidence to convict and a fair trial outcome.
But I forget the system heads - the whole system is racist there can be no justice for blacks. Then there are the placard heads - "an innocent child has died." And then, of course, the brainless celebrities - the tweet heads. 'Simple' is not the right word.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction