Bloomberg's gun control website registered to New York city
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's anti-gun group Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is registered to the city of New York and is run using city staff and city servers.
Yet the group's "action fund," through which he has piped at least $14 million of his own money in ads over gun control this year alone, is registered as a 501c4, a nonprofit "social welfare" group with the same tax status as, say, the Karl Rove-linked Crossroads GPS or Organizing for Action, President Obama's grassroots arm. And it raises questions about why a website associated with the group is being managed by City Hall.
In fact, the various pieces of the mayor's efforts appear as a confusing muddle online, with sites that are ostensibly not part of the 501c4 nonetheless being visually dominated by entreaties to click through to the ones that are. There's little indication that these are different entities with different oversight.
At minimum, the use of a city web server and city employees underscore what critics have long derided as a blurring of the lines between government resources and Bloomberg's own multi-billion-dollar fortune, his company, and his pet interests in his three terms as mayor.
Bloomberg aides strenuously pushed back on questions of propriety, insisting that there is a distinction between MAIG - which is the "broad coalition of 950 mayors" -- and the MAIG "action fund," which is the 501c4. The mayoral coalition, they argued, fits within the legislative priorities of Bloomberg's administration.
"Mayor Bloomberg is the co-chair of the coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns," said John McCarthy, a City Hall-based spokesman for Bloomberg who also handles elements of the group's media output.
Positively incestuous. And why isn't the IRS looking at Bloomberg's non-profit group for outright political activity? He has threatened congressmen and senators with defeat at the polls unless they vote his way on guns. Are we to believe these ads are "social welfare" spending?
The IRS was skeptical when it came to Tea Party groups. Apparently, some "social welfare" spending is more equal than others.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Meditation On a Poetic Incident
- A DEI Green New Deal Hydrogen Bomb
- Newsom, Bass, and Negligent Homicide
- Are Americans Breaking Bad?
- First World War Guilt and the ‘Crown Council Myth’
- Russia Invades Ukraine: The Inside Story
- Podcast Appearances Facilitate Winning Political Campaigns: Implementing Success
- Why Europe Should Close the Door to Most Migrants
- Conservative Policies: The Answer to the Housing Crisis?
- Surviving a House Fire
Blog Posts
- Gavin Newsom must be held accountable
- Looking at the snow and dreaming of a baseball tunnel
- In California, gradually, then suddenly
- Wait, there's no such thing as a Snail Darter?
- George Floyd: did a police administrator commit perjury?
- CNN sued for a billion: the trial begins
- Leftists whine about ‘conservative backlash’ to DIE
- Biblical justice... and mercy
- Punished for attacking Islamist anti-Semitism
- Claiming the good in your town
- Newsom begs Trump to come to California -- not mentioning Kamala, who has a house in the path of the inferno
- Newsom, Bass guilty of negligent homicide
- I got a feelin' called the DEI blues
- Trump lawfare: it's far from over
- Trans college volleyball: the season ends, the lawsuits begin