IRS issues new rules on Obamacare surcharge
The US taxcode may get 159 pages longer thanks to new rules issued by the IRS on investment income to be taxed as a result of the passage of Obamacare.
Read it and weep.
The Internal Revenue Service has released new rules for investment income taxes on capital gains and dividends earned by high-income individuals that passed Congress as part of the 2010 healthcare reform law.
The 3.8 percent surtax on investment income, meant to help pay for healthcare, goes into effect in 2013. It is the first surtax to be applied to capital gains and dividend income.
The tax affects only individuals with more than $200,000 in modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), and married couples filing jointly with more than $250,000 of MAGI.
![]()
The tax applies to a broad range of investment securities ranging from stocks and bonds to commodity securities and specialized derivatives.
The 159 pages of rules spell out when the tax applies to trusts and annuities, as well as to individual securities traders.
Released late on Friday, the new regulations include a 0.9 percent healthcare tax on wages for high-income individuals.
Both sets of rules will be published on Wednesday in the Federal Register.
The proposed rules are effective starting January 1. Before making the rules final, the IRS will take public comments and hold hearings in April.
Together, the two taxes are estimated to raise $317.7 billion over 10 years, according to a Joint Committee on Taxation analysis released in June.
To illustrate when the tax applies, the IRS offered an example of a taxpayer filing as a single individual who makes $180,000 in wage income plus $90,000 from investment income. The individual's modified adjusted gross income is $270,000.
The 3.8 percent tax applies to the $70,000, and the individual would pay $2,660 in surtaxes, the IRS said.
I'm glad we cleared that up. For a minute there, I thought we'd have rules that were nearly incomprehensible and injurious to the economy.
Oh...wait.
The rules won't be final until sometime next fall after there has been a suitable period of comment. You can bet the lobbyists will be busy carving out exceptions and making subtle word changes that will benefit their clients. This will make the final rules even more complicated than they need to be.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Jay Leno, Dementia, and the Impermanence of Life
- We Must Teach Children to Love Freedom More Than Government
- Judge Not
- A Good Day For The Navy
- Woke Ideology Requires Antisemitism
- Trump and the Public Trust
- Trump’s First 100 Days: A Scorecard of Wins, Waits, and Wobbles
- Larry David: No Longer the Master of his Comedic Domain
- Mass deportations without ICE enforcement
- Harvard’s Tax-Exempt Status and Religion-Based Bequests
Blog Posts
- The illegal alien raid in Colorado reveals a cancer in our military
- Forget Trump’s blue suit. What about those so-called ‘transgender’ mourners at the Pope’s funeral?
- About those port explosions in Iran *UPDATED*
- Shedeur Sander’s fall from grace
- There goes the sun?
- Trump’s 'come to Jesus’ moment on Ukraine, at Pope Francis’s funeral
- Reflections on a papal visit
- When the center-fielder saved the flag
- What vote by mail gets you
- A real deterrent for violent criminals
- Recruiting mysteriously, dramatically, increases
- Climate scientists want to shut off the sun
- Drone footage shows Pacific Palisades reservoir still empty
- Biden pops up at the pope's funeral, looking lost
- The mind-numbing, innovation-destroying DEI permeating Washington State government *UPDATED*