Surviving a 'multitude of fools'
From a Czech newspaper, quoted by Bernard Goldberg, after the election:
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
At first blush, this rings true and wise. Yet in a reality such as we inherited due to last week's election, this quote is merely enjoyable reading.
The "Prince" will, in four years...
Ensconce Obamacare and thus ensure 1/6th of the economy will be controlled by the government.
He will steer his agencies into enacting regulations, essentially unpassed legislation, which will promote his agenda and hamstring industries from coal to banking.
The Prince of Fools gets 2 or 3 Supreme Court Appointments that may last, and alter, the country for 30 or 40 years
Sharply reduce the military, the Space Program, and thus curtail weapons technologies and thus the nation's defense.
He will strike agreements with nations, as he suggested to Medvedev, that may be long on trust and weak on verification.

He will enjoy a foreign policy heavy on presumption and reliant on requested cooperation. A green light to the nefarious elements.
Certainly, as the newspaper points out, the "Fools" that elected the Prince are a big problem. It is tough to beat Santa Clause. And now the jockey is bigger than the horse, and the horse is staggering. Collecting "fools," bribing the population with its own money, seems irreversible. When once something is given, how can it be taken away?
The Prince and his court are very dangerous indeed.
Bruce Johnson
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border