Money In Politics
For those of you worried about money in politics, I provide the latest facts from Open Secrets regarding the 2012 presidential race (as of 9/2/12).
|
Obama |
Romney |
Small individual contributions |
$137,921,783 |
$37,310,424 |
Large individual contributions |
$213,696,880 |
$156,626,329 |
PAC contributions |
0 |
$838,481 |
Candidate self-financing |
$5,000 |
$52,500 |
Other |
$495,859 |
$127,544 |
Total* |
$348,413,128 |
$193,373,762 |
*Total is taken directly from Open Secrets' total. It is not clear why the subtotals add up to more than the total.
A few observations. First, Obama has raised 80% more than Romney. In fact, Obama has already spent 36% more than Romney has raised in total. Not to mention, Romney had to spend his money on winning the primary. Obama had no serious primary opponent. If money in politics is your worry, you should be more worried about Obama than Romney.
While Obama gets a bigger percentage of his war chest from small donations, he still out-draws Romney in tapping large donations, by 36%. There seem to be enough rich people who want Obama to win (or who want Obama to know that they gave him money).
Liberal bedwetters focus on the PAC numbers: Romney's $838K to Obama's zero. The talking point is that Romney is a bought candidate. This ignores two important facts: (1) Romney's PAC contributions amount to an insignificant 0.4% of his totals, and (2) Obama draws significantly more money than Romney from big-money donors, even if you include PAC money (which is insignificant).
One last observation: the total amount raised just for these two candidates exceeds half a billion dollars and the campaign is far from over. Miraculously, after McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, there is still money in politics. And almost all of that is from individual contributions rather than from corporations directly or PACs. So please, spare me the Citizens United talk; it is a red herring.
The short story: money is still in politics, most of it is from big-dollar donors, and Democrats get most of it.
Randall Hoven can be followed on Twitter.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- No, Trump Does Not Have to Abide by a Mythical 'Judicial Supremacy'
- Rush Was Right About Illegal Immigration
- The President's Trap
- Theories of Knowledge and the Media
- Tucker Carlson Needs Help
- Gaza Gaza Gaza
- Is Stargate a Gateway to the Digital Gulag?
- After USAID, America Will Never Be the Same
- The Debt Ceiling: Trump's Next Target?
- Trump FTC Must Stop Biden’s Prescription Drug Madness
Blog Posts
- Finding value that others ignore is Donald Trump’s superpower
- Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport: Where Convenience Trumps Safety
- City council of Worcester, MA votes to become an LGBTQ++ ‘sanctuary city’
- ‘Green’ politician vying for Germany’s chancellorship makes a ridiculous spectacle trying to christen a new ship with ‘safe’ contraption
- How much power does Elon Musk have?
- When it takes 12 days to get your mail...
- Are the Gazans tired of winning yet?
- Melting down over DOGE
- Massive fraud is exposed by Musk and Trump and the left is furiously melting down! Does this not reveal their consciousness of guilt?
- Our Conservative Climate Caucus
- Will POTUS be happy with SCOTUS?
- Why do we treat murdering a pregnant woman differently from abortion?
- Learning about Abe
- Liz Cheney’s never-ending farewell tour: now featuring JD Vance
- Does President Trump have to come over there to Los Angeles, again?