Silence of the shams
Senator Chuck Schumer, one of the mouthiest politicians of the last half century never at a loss for words, can't be reached for comment on President Obama's Bain Capital attack strategy. Which is rather odd, considering his remarkable past abilities to raise money from Wall Street firms. What's going on?
The answer is pretty simple. The awful truth is beginning to dawn on Democrats. Obama is trashing not just the United Sates economy, he is attacking major donors upon whom the Democrats have come to rely. Senators from New York like Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand are going to need to hit up the very people being demonized by the Obama campaign. All well and good if Obama wins -- after all, where are these donors going to go for political protection if Obama wins another term? They will for over the big bucks to avoid regulatory harassment, and other avoidable costs. The understand well that a shakedown system is in place.
But it is beginning to dawn on the deep thinkers that their guy Obama is having difficulty distracting voters from the results of his presidency and he might lose. Maybe even lose so big that Democrats lose control of the Senate. If Democrats are so discouraged that they stay home on Election Day in large numbers, the GOP could even pick up a filibuster proof majority in the Senate, horror of horrors. In that case, Schumer Gillibrand, and the entire Democrat establishment are going to need deep pocketed friends who will stick with them through thick and thin, just in case the pendulum once again swings back and Democrats have political power in the future.
So they are remaining silent about the attacks on Bain. Bill McMorris of the Washington Free Beacon reports:
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), the third ranking Democrat in the Senate, and freshman Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D., N.Y.), declined a New York Times interview to discuss the controversy on Wednesday. Neither senator has returned calls from the Washington Free Beacon, nor did second ranking Democrat, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, and former presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (D., Mass.).
"Many top Democrats are quietly hedging their bets. They're thinking, 'What if Obama doesn't win?' They're still going to be in D.C.," said a top Senate Republican aide. "What you're seeing could be one of the first indicators that not all Democrats are confident Obama can hold on."
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton waits in the tall grass. Longtime allies like Lanny Davis refute the Obama Bain attack ad. Democrats with much deeper roots than Obama in the party realize how shallow and desperate his campaign has become. I wouldn't rule very interesting, shall we say, developments behind the scenes as Democrats come to understand what Obama hath wrought.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Deep State Anatomy and Physiology
- Sisterhood of the Traveling Pronouns
- Trump’s Tariffs: A Chance to Bring Back Lost Jobs
- Trump's Six-Point Plan for Making America Great Again
- Make IRS Sauce The Same For Both Citizen Goose and Politician Gander
- 'Battle at the Border' Documentary is an Insightful Look at Immigration
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
Blog Posts
- The Atlantic's phony migrant tear-jerker about a pitiful 'Maryland father' shipped back to El Salvador falls apart
- Rep. Luna, forgets she’s on the Republican Team!
- Veruca Salt politics or the inevitable result of ‘the personal is political’
- Taliban justice in the streets of Bordeaux, and a Sharia ‘mega city’ comes to Texas
- French judge releases an accused rapist because he’s ‘fairly integrated’
- The Luigi cult is still out there, gushing and festering
- In New York, a tax service company targets illegal aliens as potential customers for child tax credits
- When antisemitic leftists play the ‘Jewish card’
- FDA’s vaccine-rubberstamp Peter Marks forced to resign, and Big Pharma stocks take a nosedive
- Will Colorado pass what’s essentially a ‘trans blasphemy’ bill? *UPDATED*
- Elie Mystal thinks every law before 1965 should be labeled ‘unconstitutional’ and defunct
- The gift that keeps on giving
- Wasting time is hard to do – leftists still manage it
- Give Trump a chance
- Nina 'Scary Poppins' Jankowicz's ex-NGO partner makes clear 'bankrupting Tesla' is his most important accomplishment